From: Jon M. <jon...@er...> - 2004-03-30 04:31:49
|
Hi all, I just checked in a new version of the "unstable" TIPC, and added a matching file release. It is a lot more stable than the previous version, but it is not ready to move over to the "stable" CVS package yet. By mistake I put the file release under the "tipc_source" line, but when considering it, I don't think that is so bad to start using that one now, so I will let it stay there. I also added a file release version of "tipc_test", the benchmark program I have been using as basic test program. It runs all the way to the end at my SMP machines, with a 2.6.4 kernel. It is infested with debug printouts, but should otherwise be useful for your testing. Note that I have changed the directory structure and makefiles, to be able to support both linux 2.4 and 2.6, as long as that is needed. I realized that the SF directory structure under any circumstances will be different from what TIPC will look like in the Linux kernel, if/when that happens, so it does not really matter what we put up there. It should just be as maintainable as possible for ourselves. I will be in Europe the next two weeks, and will not be able to do much programming over there. But I will read and answer emails. Regards /Jon This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. |