From: Jon M. <jm...@re...> - 2021-07-22 00:53:56
|
On 21/07/2021 05:13, Hoang Le wrote: > The release_sock() is blocking function, it would change the state > after sleeping. In order to evaluate the stated condition outside > the socket lock context, switch to use wait_woken() instead. > > Signed-off-by: Hoang Le <hoa...@de...> > --- > net/tipc/socket.c | 9 ++++----- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c > index 9b0b311c7ec1..2c71828b7e5c 100644 > --- a/net/tipc/socket.c > +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c > @@ -2664,7 +2664,7 @@ static int tipc_listen(struct socket *sock, int len) > static int tipc_wait_for_accept(struct socket *sock, long timeo) > { > struct sock *sk = sock->sk; > - DEFINE_WAIT(wait); > + DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function); > int err; > > /* True wake-one mechanism for incoming connections: only > @@ -2673,12 +2673,12 @@ static int tipc_wait_for_accept(struct socket *sock, long timeo) > * anymore, the common case will execute the loop only once. > */ > for (;;) { > - prepare_to_wait_exclusive(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, > - TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > if (timeo && skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) { > + add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); > release_sock(sk); > - timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo); > + timeo = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeo); > lock_sock(sk); > + remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); > } > err = 0; > if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) > @@ -2690,7 +2690,6 @@ static int tipc_wait_for_accept(struct socket *sock, long timeo) > if (signal_pending(current)) > break; > } > - finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); > return err; > } > > Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jm...@re...> |