Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next 08/16] tipc: refactor tipc_sendmsg() and tipc_lookup_anycast()

[Xue, Y. <Yin...@wi...>]

-	seq = &dest->addr.nameseq;
-	if (dest->addrtype == TIPC_ADDR_MCAST)
-		return tipc_sendmcast(sock, seq, m, dlen, timeout);
-
-	if (dest->addrtype == TIPC_SERVICE_ADDR) {
-		type = dest->addr.name.name.type;
-		inst = dest->addr.name.name.instance;
-		dnode = dest->addr.name.domain;
-		dport = tipc_nametbl_lookup_anycast(net, type, inst, &dnode);
-		if (unlikely(!dport && !dnode))
+	/* Determine destination */
+	if (atype == TIPC_SERVICE_RANGE) {

[Ying] Regarding my understanding, we should compare "atype" with TIPC_ADDR_MCAST rather than TIPC_SERVICE_RANGE. Please help to confirm.

+		return tipc_sendmcast(sock, &ua->sr, m, dlen, timeout);
+	} else if (atype == TIPC_SERVICE_ADDR) {
+		skaddr.node = ua->lookup_node;
+		ua->scope = skaddr.node ? TIPC_NODE_SCOPE : TIPC_CLUSTER_SCOPE;
+		if (!tipc_nametbl_lookup_anycast(net, ua, &skaddr))
 			return -EHOSTUNREACH;