Re: [tipc-discussion] TIPC Contianer

[Ying X. <yin...@wi...>]

On 10/16/19 4:41 AM, Mohamed Hamed El-Gamal wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I would like to ask you regarding the optimum way to run TIPC over
> containerized workload
> Will it be using MACVLAN interfaces for docker and K8s ?
> 

Interfaces attached to different containers are connected to a virtual
bridge on host, and each of contains serves as TIPC node, which
definitely works.

I think macvlan interface used as TIPC bearer for docker or k8s should
be the most efficient way. But particularly when creating macvlan
interface, it should use "bridge" mode, otherwise, TIPC links between
different containers cannot be established.

But I don't do any experiment to verify whether it works to configure
maclvan interface as TIPC bearer.

If you would like to try, please tell your test result.

> Note: We are using also Mulit-netowkring
> 
> 
> It would be great if there is any supportive documentations
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot
> Best Regards
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Garanti
> sans virus. www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tipc-discussion mailing list
> tip...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>