Re: [tipc-discussion] Link level packet loss

[Ying X. <yin...@wi...>]

Erik Hugne wrote:
>>
>> I guess sender may cause the issue. So I suggest we should add more logs
>> in link_send_sections_long() to print several variables, such as
>> fragment number, packet sequence number as well as message type like
>> FIRST_FRAGMENT, FRAGMENT and LAST_FRAGMENT etc. These logs may help us
>> find where is root cause.
>>
> I think it looks like a receiver fault.
> It's strange that the receiver (Node1) acks seq. no 19009 with 
> sequence gap 2 in packet #7392.
> This packet (seq. no 19009) should correspond to fragment #7, but 
> Node1 cannot have received that packet, since it's not visible in the 
> pcap..
>

You are right, it's very strange. But I want to know where the pcap file 
is captured, like on node 1, node 5, or even router etc.
I suggest you should capture tipc packets on both sender and receiver.

Regards,
Ying

> //E
>
>