Re: [tipc-discussion] send_msg() may not be waken up by tipc_recv_msg() when port congestion happen

[Stephens, A. <all...@wi...>]

Jon wrote:

> This reminds me that we should probably rename tipc_recv_msg() to
> tipc_recv_pkt(), and likewise for some other functions.
> Maybe something for the tipc-2.0 catchup drive.
> 
> ///jon

Agreed. The only difficulty is that cosmetic changes like this need to be integrated in patches that are specifically created for this purpose, rather than being included as part of patches that make functional changes to TIPC. What I suspect will happen is that once the bulk of the functional changes in TIPC 2.0 are done I'll end up submitting one cosmetic patch (or perhaps a small number of them) that clean up anything of this sort that is still hanging around.

-- Al