This has probably been discussed before, but does anyone else find it a little confusing that a node's "value" is its name? When I think of a "value" I think of what is inside the XML tags, not what the tag is called (in other words <name>value</name>). I realize that changing "value" to "name" would break everything, but I was just wondering if anyone else felt this way.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
This has probably been discussed before, but does anyone else find it a little confusing that a node's "value" is its name? When I think of a "value" I think of what is inside the XML tags, not what the tag is called (in other words <name>value</name>). I realize that changing "value" to "name" would break everything, but I was just wondering if anyone else felt this way.