Hi,
Instead including <libc/string.h>, we can add "include/libc" to
include's PATH and use just <string.h> for libc. Which one do you
prefer?
Br,
David Cohen
On Jan 10, 2008 10:48 PM, David Cohen <da...@gm...> wrote:
> Fixing libc include path on device.c
>
> Signed-off-by: David Cohen <da...@gm...>
> ---
> kernel/device.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/device.c b/kernel/device.c
> index 44374ab..d5d1901 100644
> --- a/kernel/device.c
> +++ b/kernel/device.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>
> #include <tinyx/device.h>
> #include <tinyx/list.h>
> -#include <tinyx/libc/string.h>
> +#include <libc/string.h>
>
> DECLARE_LIST_HEAD(bus_list);
> DECLARE_LIST_HEAD(driver_list);
> --
> 1.5.3.7
>
>
--
David Cohen
Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT
Manaus - Brazil
|
