Menu
▾
▴
tinytim-discuss
|
From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-07-16 13:36:31
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi lars, irgendwie kann ich mit meinem eclipse kein verzeichniss im svn erstellen, hast du das mit der sf.net website gemacht? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIffgNbsixtqnWg1oRAquNAJsHkAomyHW+nbsRIm2S456DwsZVVACeP5FA FU+5dDs1LmGKsidL9p6itfc= =6ULp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-07-16 14:34:51
|
Hi Stefan, [...] > irgendwie kann ich mit meinem eclipse kein verzeichniss im svn > erstellen, hast du das mit der sf.net > website gemacht? No, via a normal SVN client. Strange, I tried to create an inital layout, but I get a 403 forbidden msg. Maybe SF is defunct again. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-07-16 14:46:42
|
[...] > No, via a normal SVN client. Strange, I tried to create an inital > layout, but I get a 403 forbidden msg. Maybe SF is defunct again. Even a "normal" commit does not work. I changed the CHANGES.txt file for testing purposes and tried to commit that change but get the same error. I guess we've to wait. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-07-16 14:51:35
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ok, ill try later, while working throw the tmapi-utils xtm-parser i wrote some years ago, i'm really thinking twice about changing from xmlpull to StAX. dunno why to do it, xmlpull is simple and the xpp3/mxp1 parser is the fastest one at the world. using stax might be more in a jcp/jsr way, but the parsers (e.g. woodstox) are monsters (500k jarsize). so why not using the good old stuff, i think the user wont have a look at inside. so i propose to just "fix" the stuff that is not working with the old parser and then we have a lightweight and fast tinytim-io package (max 100k with parser,xmlpull api, and xtm-parser) what you think? stefan Lars Heuer wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > [...] >> irgendwie kann ich mit meinem eclipse kein verzeichniss im svn >> erstellen, hast du das mit der sf.net >> website gemacht? > > No, via a normal SVN client. Strange, I tried to create an inital > layout, but I get a 403 forbidden msg. Maybe SF is defunct again. > > Best regards, > Lars -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIfgmybsixtqnWg1oRAlJcAJ9E28JnXts7KLkfB0crBZNseLAskACgjaPa 0n+wEYoOn3wv1Tlyj9mXhu0= =mCfM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-07-16 15:16:40
|
Hi Stefan, [...] > so i propose to just "fix" the stuff that is not working with the > old parser and then we have a lightweight and fast tinytim-io > package (max 100k with parser,xmlpull api, and xtm-parser) > what you think? Either is okay, I think. StAX seems to be part of Java 6, so the size of the StAX implementations may become less important in the near future. But I really do not care, either is okay. I've never got closely in touch with pull parsing, does xmlpull provide a class for writing XML like StAX or do you want to write the XML via SAX or something other? Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-07-17 09:31:38
|
[SVN commit does not work] > No, via a normal SVN client. Strange, I tried to create an inital > layout, but I get a 403 forbidden msg. Maybe SF is defunct again. Works again, if you update to rev 82, you'll see the initial directory layout for tinytim-io. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-07-29 09:16:58
|
Hi, FYI: i decided to switch to StAX, i found some small StAX implementations and even some for J2ME, so i did the easy port and now i'm trying to go through (and creating new) all junit tests. Stefan Lars Heuer wrote: > Hi Stefan, > >>> Either is okay, I think. StAX seems to be part of Java 6, so the size >>> of the StAX implementations may become less important in the near >>> future. > >> hmm i forgot about this, have to rethink again :-) > > :) We'd have the option to say, that Java 1.5 users have to download a > StAX impl of their choice and 1.6 users can simply use the default > impl. Moving to 1.6 is a bit early, in my opinion. |
|
From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-07-29 15:41:45
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ok, but there seems to be no tests for XTM 1.0 Lars Heuer wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > [...] >> i did the easy port and now i'm trying to go through (and creating >> new) all junit tests. > > For the unit tests you should use the CXTM test suite and tinyTiM's > Canonicalizer. I can help if necessary. The CXTM test suite has the > advantage that it is verified by 3rd parties and covers most aspects > of importing topic maps. > > Best regards, > Lars -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIjzjjbsixtqnWg1oRAo9kAJ4zCiF+KDt1cDicRL/efQ4nCWoAEwCfd61t lfCpwbjDp1jNC2bpxYkE0Og= =gjKB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-07-29 15:49:08
|
Hi Stefan, > ok, but there seems to be no tests for XTM 1.0 There are a few (not enough, though) XTM 1.0 tests: <http://cxtm-tests.cvs.sourceforge.net/cxtm-tests/cxtm-tests/xtm1/> Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-07-16 16:04:45
|
Hi Stefan, >> Either is okay, I think. StAX seems to be part of Java 6, so the size >> of the StAX implementations may become less important in the near >> future. > hmm i forgot about this, have to rethink again :-) :) We'd have the option to say, that Java 1.5 users have to download a StAX impl of their choice and 1.6 users can simply use the default impl. Moving to 1.6 is a bit early, in my opinion. >> I've never got closely in touch with pull parsing, > i attached an article i wrote about stax some years ago in the > xml&webservices magzin, it reads quickly and give you a small > overview. Merci. >> provide a class for writing XML like StAX or do you want to write the >> XML via SAX or something other? > xmlpull has also an xmlserializer, just have a look at the > tmapi-utils xtmwriter it is already using it. Ah, well, yes. Forgotten :) Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-07-29 09:34:08
|
Hi Stefan, [...] > i did the easy port and now i'm trying to go through (and creating > new) all junit tests. For the unit tests you should use the CXTM test suite and tinyTiM's Canonicalizer. I can help if necessary. The CXTM test suite has the advantage that it is verified by 3rd parties and covers most aspects of importing topic maps. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X