Re: [tinyTiM-discuss] tinyTiM MIO vs. TMAPIX I/O

[Hannes N. <h.n...@go...>]

Hi,

As long there is an IO library I don't mind how it is called ;)

Well I guess you won't drop TMAPIX IO and maintaining two similar
libraries is not very efficient.

Long story short: I agree. (which means +1 :) )

regards
Hannes

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Lars Heuer<he...@se...> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if I should drop tinyTiM MIO in the near future.
>
> I added tinyTiM's JSON Topic Maps writer and the XTM writers to the
> TMAPIX I/O project. That required only 3 - 5 lines code changes since
> the writers do not used much of tinyTiM's internal API. The writers in
> the TMAPIX I/O project operate upon TMAPI and should therefor work
> with any TMAPI 2.0 compatible engine.
>
> The CXTMWriter may require some more work, though; and I did not look
> at the CTMWriter yet.
>
> Anyway, if you look closely at tinyTiM's MIO package you'll notice
> that it contains very few dependencies at tinyTiM (thanks to the
> Streaming API).
>
> I won't remove tinytim.mio tomorrow or next week, I just want to hear
> what the users of tinyTiM think about such a step (yes, I mean you
> both ;)).
>
> Best regards,
> Lars
> --
> Semagia
> <http://www.semagia.com>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> tinyTiM-discuss mailing list
> tin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tinytim-discuss
>



-- 
Onotoa - Simply create your Topic Maps schemas.
http://onotoa.topicmapslab.de

http://www.topicmapslab.de/people/Hannes_Niederhausen