Re: [tinyTiM-discuss] tinyTiM distribution

[Lars H. <he...@se...>]

Hi Markus,

>> [...] What do you think? Would
>>   a) tinytim-mio-batteries-included
>>   b) meta-tinytim (the engine and mio)
>> be a good addition to the current distribution model?
> ad a) Maybe it would make life at tiny litte bit easier for those who
> want to try out tinytim _fast_ (e.g., after reading a short TM(API)
[...]

Yes, I have that kind of users in mind. And those who want to use
tinyTiM in Applets.

I am not sure if I'd use that distribution, it would just be an offer
for users who want to place two libs in the CP and start with TMAPI,
as you stated above.

> ad b) Why should this mean that tinytim and tinytim-mio releases
> wouldn't be independent anymore? Wouldn't the meta-release simply
> include/reference the respective latest official releases?

You're right. Although the meta distribution would either be outdated
if we release tinytim-mio (without a new release of tinytim) or the
meta distribution has to be updated at each release of tinytim-mio and
tinytim.

I think, I'll offer (a) first and maybe (b) later.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>