From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2009-08-13 11:53:19
|
Hi all, I wonder if it makes sense to add another tinyTiM distribution (especially for mio). While I like the current distribution (just pick the mio libs you're actually using, and update the mio libs independently of tinytim-mio), I think it might be nice to have one jar with batteries included. That lib would include all semagia-mio dependencies, so the user needs only the slf4j-libs and (if validation is necessary), the jing lib. I could also include the slf4j-libs, if that's worth. Maybe I could also add another (meta) distribution which includes the engine and the tinytim-mio package. The disadvantage would be, that releasing tinytim-mio and tinytim wouldn't be independent anymore. What do you think? Would a) tinytim-mio-batteries-included b) meta-tinytim (the engine and mio) be a good addition to the current distribution model? Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |