Re: [tinyTiM-discuss] tinyTiM and MIO

[Stefan L. <li...@ap...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

So do we have to provide the parse(tmsystem,input) for xtm 1.0 ?


Lars Heuer wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> [...]
>> correct me if i'm wrong, and don't blame me, i did not work with tm
>> for quite some time, but isn't the document IRI contained in the
>> file?
> 
> In XTM 1.0 it may be contained in the file (xml:base), and LTM
> provides also a #BASEURI directive, but this isn't the case for
> "modern" Topic Maps syntaxes. The IRI of the document is used or the
> application has to provide a document IRI.
> 
> C.f. XTM 2.0: <http://www.isotopicmaps.org/sam/sam-xtm/#d0e361>
> 
>      4.2. Deserialization
>      [...]
> 
>      The input to the deserialization process is:
>      [...]
>      * An absolute IRI. This is the IRI from which the XTM document was
>      retrieved, known as the document IRI. This IRI shall always be
>      provided, as it is necessary in order to assign the item
>      identifiers of the topic items created during deserialization. If
>      the XTM document was not read from any particular IRI the
>      application is responsible for providing an IRI considered
>      suitable.
>      [...]
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Lars

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIa6jUbsixtqnWg1oRAoopAJ4p4lgMWYZ+1c4QpKOpNLlu8/2+uACfUJRC
s4Uhf6w6MpY1Xn5bihHQ958=
=+kbr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----