Re: [tinyTiM-discuss] tinyTiM and MIO

[Lars H. <he...@se...>]

Hi Stefan,

[...]
> correct me if i'm wrong, and don't blame me, i did not work with tm
> for quite some time, but isn't the document IRI contained in the
> file?

In XTM 1.0 it may be contained in the file (xml:base), and LTM
provides also a #BASEURI directive, but this isn't the case for
"modern" Topic Maps syntaxes. The IRI of the document is used or the
application has to provide a document IRI.

C.f. XTM 2.0: <http://www.isotopicmaps.org/sam/sam-xtm/#d0e361>

     4.2. Deserialization
     [...]

     The input to the deserialization process is:
     [...]
     * An absolute IRI. This is the IRI from which the XTM document was
     retrieved, known as the document IRI. This IRI shall always be
     provided, as it is necessary in order to assign the item
     identifiers of the topic items created during deserialization. If
     the XTM document was not read from any particular IRI the
     application is responsible for providing an IRI considered
     suitable.
     [...]


Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>