From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-07-02 15:55:56
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 correct me if i'm wrong, and don't blame me, i did not work with tm for quite some time, but isn't the document IRI contained in the file? Lars Heuer wrote: > [...] >>> but if i don't know the document IRI? just parsing a file from the >>> web/p2p network. So i think, the first style is needed for this >>> case. > >> I think the document IRI is overestimated. IMO it would be better if > [...] > > Example: If you send me a file "mymap.ctm" with the following content: > > tinytim. > > and I place it into the directory "/home/lars/maps/" and I read it > into my engine, I get a topic with the item identifier > <file:///home/lars/maps/mymap.ctm#tinytim>. > > And if I send that file to my friend Donald Duck (assuming that > Duckburg has a broadband connection ;)) and he places that file into > the directory "/home/donald/", and he reads that file in, he gets a > topic with the item identifier > <file:///home/donald/mymap.ctm#tinytim>. > > > You see, the local identifiers are never stable. If you want, that I > get back exactly the same topic map, you have to tell me your document > IRI and I can provide that document IRI to my TopicMapReader. > > Best regards, > Lars -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIa6PQbsixtqnWg1oRAh8ZAJ0eum4WKNRnDLcRn6NwH6dPD5HiUACgmF0b EGX2kTm7RcqODelE6/FCkwI= =JYHv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |