Re: [tinyTiM-discuss] tinyTiM and MIO

[Stefan L. <li...@ap...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

a sounds good, but do we need an IOFactory? or let the user simple call

new XTM20Serializer(...)

?

Lars Heuer wrote:
> [...]
>> IMO it would be nice if we'd create a generic API to import topic
>> maps, independently of the concrete syntax, so I'd favour .io.
> 
> Maybe the proposal was a bit vague, here possible layouts I'd prefer:
> 
> a)
>   org.tinytim.io:
>   * Deserializer (interface)
>   * Serializer (interface)
> 
>   org.tinytim.io.xtm
>   * XTMDeserializer
>   * XTMSerializer (or XTM10Serializer and XTM20Serializer)
> 
>   org.tinytim.io.another-syntax
>   * AnotherSyntaxDeserializer
>   * ...
> 
> b)
>   org.tinytim.io:
>   * Deserializer (interface)
>   * Serializer (interface)
>   * XTMDeserializer
>   * XTMSerializer (or XTM10/XTM20Serializer)
>   * AnotherSyntaxDeserializer
> 
> 
> Personally, I like (a) more.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Lars

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIa2+wbsixtqnWg1oRAoDQAKCP/FNkJHWpNZL6eeso6bU5DYTGqgCfb3Sl
wOclTeSroHA5rmk2QFBAbOw=
=+dQ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----