Re: [tinyTiM-discuss] tinyTiM and MIO

[Stefan L. <li...@ap...>]

Hi,

>> i would prefer to "fix" the tmapi-utils parser. Not just fixing it,
>> but using latest StAX parser and api. This design is easier to
>> understand compared to a callback-handler / stackusing parser.
> 
> Okay, no problem. Will you fix it? Should be straight forward, since

OK, i hope to find some time in the nights ahead, i want to commit it to tinyTIM directly no
subpackage, please vote!


> I have a TestCase impl. that does the work more or less automatically,
> I'll contribute it this week to the CXTM subproject.

take your time, first i will redesign it and then we will test it with your nice stuff.


>> i think the adapter (not the mio libraries) could stay as a part of
>> the project, for example as tinytim-mio-xtm and tinytim-mio-cxtm,
>> but we need to provide a very very simple way of parsing and writing
>> xtm 1.0/2.0 wihtin the project, with all sources.
> 
> Hmm... . The CXTM package has nothing to do with MIO. And we need just
> one "tinytim-mio" package, since you need only one concrete adapter to
> "parse" every syntax you can think of. ;)
> 
> Proposal:
> * Leave tinytim-cxtm as it is
right +1, no dependencies to mio

> * Leave the MapInputHandler in the tinytim-io package or put it into a
>   new package "tinytim-mio".

+1 for renaming to tinytim-mio (btw. can subprojects be renamed?)

> * Replace TopicMapImporter with something that does not use MIO

which TopicMapImporter?