From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-06-28 13:46:52
|
Hi Stefan, [...] > zu dem sl4j, klar facaden sind immer gut, hätte nur ein bedenken für die leute die bisher tinyTIM in > Applets benutzt haben, die müssen nur die logging jars mit reinpacken. Right, or we use Utilities like OneJar (not sure if that works since we need the API and an implementation of SLF4J). Hmmm... maybe we stick with the java.logging for the 1.5 series and wait for other opinions and may switch to SLF4J in the 2.0 branch (if TMAPI 2.0 become reality). BTW, MIO requires SLF4J anyway, but MIO is independent of tinyTiM. Markus, what do you think? Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com/> |