From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-04-22 15:08:10
|
Hi, I totally agree, we should keep it as simple as possible without any additional jars. as a programmer i'm only used to log4j, so i don't know much about the java logging api and its pros and cons. stefan Lars Heuer wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder which logging framework we should use for tinyTiM. Maybe we > should use the Java Logging API? It would support the tinyTiM motto > "Just download and use it" without the need to install other jars. > > Personally, I like SLF4J <http://www.slf4j.org/> which supports the > Java 1.4 logging framework. But this would require one additional lib > in the classpath. > > In conclusion, I think we should stick with the standard Java Logging > API. > > Thoughts? > > Best regards, > Lars |