Re: [tinyTiM-discuss] The battleplan aka roadmap

[Stefan L. <li...@ap...>]

Hi Lars,


> I don't mind, if you think it's nice to keep the TMAPI / tinyTiM
> versions aligned. Let's call it "1.5".
OK

>> OK, so we need Junit Tests for the actual Version that fail and work on
>> tinyTIM 1.X
>> AFAIK tinyTIM 1.0 SP1 passes all TMAPI Junit tests.
>>     
>
> Yes, but tinyTiM has some other problems. The TMAPI tests are
> sufficient to test all aspects of a Topic Maps engine.
>
> I submit some unit test but we can create more. Tests do no harm. ;)
>   
dito, i'm totally into test-driven development.

> Anyway, I think I won't have much time to work intensively on tinyTiM
> in the next weeks since I've to finish together with Gab and Dmitry
> the next CTM draft. Additionally, I have two other Topic Maps engines
> in the pipeline and I like to finish / publish the MIO project. The
> re-creation of tinyTiM was an accident / not planned. ;)
>   
No problem, just commit your code to the svn and i'll play with it and
write some more tests and if we both are happy lets release.

What are these 2 other tm engines and the MIO project? confidential?
>> Dunno if we should put these Junit tests to the TMAPI Test-suite or put
>> it in the tinyTIM SVN
>>     
>
> I'd propose to keep them separated. We include a test-runner for these
> but the tests itself should not be imported into the SVN.
>   
hmm, where do you think we should develop the test suite? i think the
tinyTIM svn might be the right place?
we should not put it in the release.
>> What about
>> http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/
>> it now links to the wiki, is the old page still available? its ok to put
>> it down, but i need a clear screenshot before closing this site.
>>     
>
> Attached. Sorry.
Thanks no problem, the html is enough, i'm doing a screenshot for my
history book myself.

Stefan