Menu
▾
▴
tiny-cobol-users
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 1999 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(341) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 |
Jan
(42) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(59) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(51) |
Nov
(95) |
Dec
(99) |
| 2001 |
Jan
(105) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(411) |
Apr
(310) |
May
(294) |
Jun
(213) |
Jul
(132) |
Aug
(82) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(121) |
Nov
(181) |
Dec
(96) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(128) |
Mar
(141) |
Apr
(111) |
May
(149) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(77) |
Sep
(62) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(58) |
Mar
(120) |
Apr
(180) |
May
(206) |
Jun
(110) |
Jul
(232) |
Aug
(207) |
Sep
(103) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(68) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(83) |
Feb
(107) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(42) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(116) |
Nov
(96) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(69) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Glen C. <gco...@US...> - 1999-12-05 01:08:21
|
I got this on the daily diary message. That's probobly OK for me. GLen > -----Original Message----- > From: tin...@so... > [mailto:tin...@so...] > Sent: Friday, December 03, 1999 1:00 PM > To: tin...@ma... > Subject: Tiny-cobol-users digest, Vol 1 #2 - 1 msg > > > > Send Tiny-cobol-users mailing list submissions to > tin...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the web, visit > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tiny-cobol-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > tin...@li... > You can reach the person managing the list at > tin...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than > "Re: Contents of Tiny-cobol-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. May we change to this mailing list? (Rildo Pragana) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 17:50:50 -0200 (EDT) > From: Rildo Pragana <rpr...@ac...> > To: tin...@ma... > Subject: [Tiny-cobol-users] May we change to this mailing list? > > Hi, > > If you did already subscribed, please answer to this message. I would like > to know if everyone is at this mailing list. If so, we can stop sending > mails directly to the others. > With a mailing list is better, because we have everything archived and > others (not developers) can participate and give their suggestions. > > regards, > _____ _ __ __ __ __ ___ __ Rildo Pragana > /\ '__`\/\`'__\/'__`\ /'_ `\ /'__`\ /' _ `\ /'__`\ P.O. Box 721 > \ \ \L\ \ \ \//\ \L\.\_/\ \L\ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \/\ \/\ \L\.\_ Camaragibe > \ \ ,__/\ \_\\ \__/.\_\ \____ \ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ PE Brazil > \ \ \/ \/_/ \/__/\/_/\/___L\ \/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/ 54792-990 > \ \_\ rpr...@ac... /\____/ FPGA/uControllers * Linux * tcl/tk > \/_/ +55-81-459-1776 \_/__/ http://members.xoom.com/rpragana/ > > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Tiny-cobol-users mailing list > Tin...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tiny-cobol-users > > > End of Tiny-cobol-users Digest > |
|
From: Rildo P. <rpr...@ac...> - 1999-12-04 20:05:01
|
Hi,
Please, I ask you to test if the unstring statemente, I finished just now
the implementation is working as expected (as I'm not really a cobol
programmer). There is an example of it in test.code/t14/test14.cob.
If it is found any bug or mis-behaviour, please report to me.
It is available by cvs only.
Thank you.
regards,
_____ _ __ __ __ __ ___ __ Rildo Pragana
/\ '__`\/\`'__\/'__`\ /'_ `\ /'__`\ /' _ `\ /'__`\ P.O. Box 721
\ \ \L\ \ \ \//\ \L\.\_/\ \L\ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \/\ \/\ \L\.\_ Camaragibe
\ \ ,__/\ \_\\ \__/.\_\ \____ \ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ PE Brazil
\ \ \/ \/_/ \/__/\/_/\/___L\ \/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/ 54792-990
\ \_\ rpr...@ac... /\____/ FPGA/uControllers * Linux * tcl/tk
\/_/ +55-81-459-1776 \_/__/ http://members.xoom.com/rpragana/
|
|
From: David E. <de...@ar...> - 1999-12-04 01:59:11
|
At 05:50 PM 03/12/99 -0200, Rildo wrote: > >If you did already subscribed, please answer to this message. I would like >to know if everyone is at this mailing list. If so, we can stop sending >mails directly to the others. >With a mailing list is better, because we have everything archived and >others (not developers) can participate and give their suggestions. Yes, I have subscribed. But the tiny-cobol-developers is still not up. David |
|
From: Rildo P. <rpr...@ac...> - 1999-12-03 19:50:19
|
Hi,
If you did already subscribed, please answer to this message. I would like
to know if everyone is at this mailing list. If so, we can stop sending
mails directly to the others.
With a mailing list is better, because we have everything archived and
others (not developers) can participate and give their suggestions.
regards,
_____ _ __ __ __ __ ___ __ Rildo Pragana
/\ '__`\/\`'__\/'__`\ /'_ `\ /'__`\ /' _ `\ /'__`\ P.O. Box 721
\ \ \L\ \ \ \//\ \L\.\_/\ \L\ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \/\ \/\ \L\.\_ Camaragibe
\ \ ,__/\ \_\\ \__/.\_\ \____ \ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ PE Brazil
\ \ \/ \/_/ \/__/\/_/\/___L\ \/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/ 54792-990
\ \_\ rpr...@ac... /\____/ FPGA/uControllers * Linux * tcl/tk
\/_/ +55-81-459-1776 \_/__/ http://members.xoom.com/rpragana/
|
|
From: Glen C. <gco...@US...> - 1999-12-01 05:39:54
|
I sure hope I didn't mess up the upgrades that I just applied to the baseline. I also hope that you all approve of the changes... 1) Integrated the command line processing from htglobals. You can do a htcobol -h to see the currently available options. 2) Changed the error output handling to set a "Cobol"ish return code. 3) Added a wrapper function to yyerror to allow the setting of numeric error codes and error severity levels. The compiler should act just as before from the command line if new options are not used. Once everyone gets their scripts functioning with the -P command line option (instead of the -l), I will add the code to pass library information to the link editor. I propose that we settle on the following return codes from the compiler (and change exit/return codes when we are in the modules) 0 = informational 4 = warning 8 = error 12 = critical error 16 = OS critical error Also, we should change all of the references to yyerror to use hterror. hterror requires an error number and severity as well as the varargs that yyerror is currently getting. I will be the first to admit that the temporary error code as a global is an ugly hack, but I didn't want to try to rework yyerror (probably a worse idea...) I am willing to do the yyerror changes. I just wanted to minimize the changes that I was making until you all could approve of them or tell me to get out of the code ;) Glen |
24 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
