Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] Segmentation Fault

[Reg <re...@ri...>]

Hi David,
Just something I vaguely remember about more recent gcc returning a
different OK response to older versions, but probably nothing to do with
this problem.....
Anyway, will try your new version and suggestion when I get some free time -
eventually.
Thanks for your efforts.
Regards,
Reg.


David Essex-2 wrote:
> 
> Reg wrote:
> 
>> Maybe take a look at my message of September 6th.?
> 
> Not sure to what you are specifically reffering.
> 
> Anyway, using Valgrind and with Roger's help, I uploaded some memory bug 
> fixes.
> And hopefully, I did not introduce any new bugs to TC CVS (0.63.79).
> 
> If the CVS version does not fix the problem you are encountering, then 
> the only thing I can suggest is to post a Valgrind trace.
> 
> Example:
> #valgrind --leak-check=full htcobol -c -P -I. GCMMSTMN.COB  2>&1 | 
> GCMMSTMN.trace.txt
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Tin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tiny-cobol-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Segmentation-Fault-tf4383688.html#a13188743
Sent from the tiny-cobol-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.