Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] Segmentation Fault

[Reg <re...@ri...>]

David Essex-2 wrote:
> 
> Reg wrote:
> 
>  > Thanks David, will follow up..... eventually.
>  > Currently sinking under workload, but still
>  > keen on sorting this.
>  > Any idea when CVS moving to stable?
> 
> Well, it is policy to keep SF CVS stable. Meaning that it should compile
> and run.
> 
> The current SF CVS version should be relatively stable. It passed the
> 'test_suite' tests.
> 
> But a large number of changes have been made to the sources, especially
> in the RTL. So further testing will be required.
> 
> For example the indexed file IO RTL has been radically changed.
> Indexed files are now stored using a data (.dat) file and a index file
> (.dbx).
> This makes indexed files incompatible with files created with previous
> versions of TC.
> 
> In any case, any feedback regarding current SF CVS version, would be
> appreciated.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Wow, back to IS fundamentals! Well, that should speed things up
> performance-wise.
> I will get back onto this when I can, and will be back in touch.
> Meanwhile, thanks again for your help.
> Regards,
> Reg.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Tin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tiny-cobol-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Segmentation-Fault-tf4383688.html#a12533437
Sent from the tiny-cobol-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.