Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] Segmentation Fault

[David E. <de...@us...>]

Reg wrote:

 > Thanks David, will follow up..... eventually.
 > Currently sinking under workload, but still
 > keen on sorting this.
 > Any idea when CVS moving to stable?

Well, it is policy to keep SF CVS stable. Meaning that it should compile
and run.

The current SF CVS version should be relatively stable. It passed the
'test_suite' tests.

But a large number of changes have been made to the sources, especially
in the RTL. So further testing will be required.

For example the indexed file IO RTL has been radically changed.
Indexed files are now stored using a data (.dat) file and a index file
(.dbx).
This makes indexed files incompatible with files created with previous
versions of TC.

In any case, any feedback regarding current SF CVS version, would be
appreciated.

Cheers