From: David E. <de...@us...> - 2007-09-06 18:15:53
|
Reg wrote: > ... >> Thanks for rapid response. >> Doesn't seem to matter which source code, so >> looks like compiler bug. >> Will debug it when I get chance, probably >> about 3 or 4 weeks. >> Meanwhile, I seem to recall someone muttering >> about gcc 3 returning a yes/ok instead of a 0/1 >> or vice versa on a memory alloc, so might try >> running on an older machine. The latest release (and CVS) was developed using GCC3x. AFAIK, TC was never tested on any GCC4. And there were some problems reported. I don't recall the specifics. If you are feeling REALLY adventurous, you could try the current 'new and improved' CVS version. Cheers PS. How to download CVS version using anonymous CVS: cvsopts='-da...@ti...:/cvsroot/tiny-cobol' cvs $cvsopts login Password: <enter> cvs -z3 $cvsopts co -P development |