Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] http://www.eclipse.org/cobol/

[Bernard G. <bg...@fr...>]

Hudson Reis a écrit :

> Hi Larry,
>
> > RE: [Tiny-cobol-users] Bugs in DISPLAYIs anyone considering adapting tinycobol to use a free IDE?
>
> Adapting? I don't understand your question. An IDE is a IDE. A compiler is a compiler... I don't see changes to use any IDE. I'm wrong?
>
> > Fujitsu Cobol ported their compiler to Linux and are using eclipse.  See  http://www.eclipse.org/cobol/   and www.adtools.com for details.
> >
>
> I look this and a detail invited my attention. Look below:
>

Apparently, eclipse need a so-called bridge to talk to
the underlying COBOL compiler and native debugger.

But I agree on the principle: we could gain more audience
if we have a better support.

> License
> This project is licensed under the Common Public License.
>
> What license is this? is GPL?
>
> > I believe tinycobol would see even a greater success if it had a good IDE and eclipse may be what we need.  I don't know how to tie the two together.  Maybe someone out there does.  Any takers?
> >
> > Comments.anybody.....
>
> Exist a IDE called SourceNavigator in http://sources.redhat.com/sourcenav. I use it with TinyCOBOL with out problems(Compilation, Link step, Edition.). It does support Tcl, C, Java, COBOL, Fortran, Assembly.. look it!
> I create a lot of screenshots in our wiki about SourceNavigator. See this in http://pragana.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SourceNavigator.
>
> Regards.
> Hudson
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Tin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tiny-cobol-users