From: Marcin C. <ma...@in...> - 2002-11-26 21:06:17
|
Witaj tikiwiki-devel-request, W Twoim liście datowanym 26 listopada 2002 (19:19:05) można przeczytać: tdrlsn> My vote for a new feature would be a WYSIWYG editor. tdrlsn> There are several open source ones available now that are easy to integrate into a web page. tdrlsn> Mostly they only work with recent versions of IE, but that would be fine for us and I suspect many tdrlsn> others. I do not aggree. IE is not the only browser. I preffer mozilla or opera and work mainly on Linux. So if we want to add WYSIWYG support I think it will be better to prepare some kind of WYSIWYG template support that can be used than to build your Wiki page. -- Pozdrowienia, Marcin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NEWSY. Minuta po minucie. >>> http://link.interia.pl/f168a |
From: Garland F. <gar...@fi...> - 2002-11-26 21:42:43
|
The idea of meta-templates for wiki-pages, articles, reviews and so as suggested by Tom and Marcin starts to look interesting, admins can edit templates that can be filled-in for wiki-pages, articles etc, the question is what is the best way to implement this feature? A screen to admin templates and then a combo to select the template that will fill the editing textarea with the template? This seems the most simple and easy to use approach if someone has ideas just write... Garland. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcin Chojnowski" <ma...@in...> To: "tik...@li..." <tik...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:06 PM Subject: [Tikiwiki-devel] Re: Tikiwiki-devel digest, Vol 1 #18 - 12 msgs > Witaj tikiwiki-devel-request, > > W Twoim li=9Ccie datowanym 26 listopada 2002 (19:19:05) mo=BFna przeczy= ta=E6: > tdrlsn> My vote for a new feature would be a WYSIWYG editor. > tdrlsn> There are several open source ones available now that are easy = to integrate into a web page. > tdrlsn> Mostly they only work with recent versions of IE, but that woul= d be fine for us and I suspect many > tdrlsn> others. > > I do not aggree. IE is not the only browser. I preffer mozilla or > opera and work mainly on Linux. So if we want to add WYSIWYG support I > think it will be better to prepare some kind of WYSIWYG template > support that can be used than to build your Wiki page. > > > -- > Pozdrowienia, > Marcin > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > NEWSY. Minuta po minucie. >>> http://link.interia.pl/f168a > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T > handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en > _______________________________________________ > Tikiwiki-devel mailing list > Tik...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel |
From: James H. T. <jh...@la...> - 2002-11-26 23:31:16
|
>A screen to admin templates and then a combo to select the template that >will fill the editing textarea >with the template? This seems the most simple and easy to use approach if >someone has ideas just write... A slightly different approach. How about multiple textareas? A template could have slots for multiple text areas. Each text area would insert its content into the appropiate slot in the template. Jim |
From: Garland F. <gar...@fi...> - 2002-11-27 13:48:45
|
So we have two approaches, shall we vote? What is the best way to add the use of templates to Wiki-Pages, Articles and Reviews? Multiple textareas to fill a template or a txt that fills the textarea that the user edits and the user should fill the empty spaces? I'm voting the multiple textareas option. Multiple textareas 1 Txt templates 0 Garland ----- Original Message ----- From: "James H. Thompson" <jh...@la...> To: "Garland Foster" <gar...@fi...>; "tik...@li..." <tik...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:30 PM Subject: Re: [Tikiwiki-devel] Tiki 1.4 brainstorming > >A screen to admin templates and then a combo to select the template that > >will fill the editing textarea > >with the template? This seems the most simple and easy to use approach if > >someone has ideas just write... > > A slightly different approach. How about multiple textareas? > A template could have slots for multiple text areas. Each text area would insert its content into > the appropiate slot in the template. > > Jim > > |