tikiwiki-deutsch

[Tiki-de] Tiki in Germany's c't magazine

[Alexander M. <ma...@am...>]

Hi everybuddy,

Germany's well-respected computer magazine c't (of heise fame) has an
article on wiki software and chose Tiki as one of five to evaluate. They
say themselves that the big heyday of wikis is over, so this is not a
massive test, more like a round-up of what does the wiki world look like
now that it's more than fifteen years old. So, I'd say that even to be
chosen is quite good already! And in the end... we do look damn sexy
imho! :)

They speak about our monolithic no-addon-no-cry concept and do like the
results despite all scepticism towards such all-in-one-solutions. They
think we manage to organise the flood of features quite well and call
the new admin wizard "clever" (it's even worth a screen shot). Our
plethora of wiki plug-ins is worth mentioning as well as the "well
defined lifecycle of the product" with regular updates and LTS versions.
In the end they put us in the enterprise wiki corner and the comparison
chart makes us look quite good, too.

Here's a scan of the article:
	http://dl.amette.eu/2014-02-ct-Wiki-Software.pdf

Congrats to everyone involved in creating this wonderful product. Kick
back a bit, feel praised and grab a beer - you've earned it! :)

cheers
amette
-- 
https://amette.eu
ma...@am...

Re: [Tiki-de] [Tiki-devel] Tiki in Germany's c't magazine

[Xavier de P. <xav...@vh...>]

Wohooo! :-)
Congrats. everyone!!!
Nice to see this type of review every now and then.

When they said that we don't have "blacklisting", they might have
skipped the Admin Banning feature...

Cheers

Xavi

On 14/02/14 17:59, Alexander Mette wrote:
> Hi everybuddy,
>
> Germany's well-respected computer magazine c't (of heise fame) has an
> article on wiki software and chose Tiki as one of five to evaluate. They
> say themselves that the big heyday of wikis is over, so this is not a
> massive test, more like a round-up of what does the wiki world look like
> now that it's more than fifteen years old. So, I'd say that even to be
> chosen is quite good already! And in the end... we do look damn sexy
> imho! :)
>
> They speak about our monolithic no-addon-no-cry concept and do like the
> results despite all scepticism towards such all-in-one-solutions. They
> think we manage to organise the flood of features quite well and call
> the new admin wizard "clever" (it's even worth a screen shot). Our
> plethora of wiki plug-ins is worth mentioning as well as the "well
> defined lifecycle of the product" with regular updates and LTS versions.
> In the end they put us in the enterprise wiki corner and the comparison
> chart makes us look quite good, too.
>
> Here's a scan of the article:
> 	http://dl.amette.eu/2014-02-ct-Wiki-Software.pdf
>
> Congrats to everyone involved in creating this wonderful product. Kick
> back a bit, feel praised and grab a beer - you've earned it! :)
>
> cheers
> amette

Re: [Tiki-de] [Tiki-devel] Tiki in Germany's c't magazine

[Marc L. <ma...@ma...>]

This is the definition on WikiMatrix:
http://www.wikimatrix.org/wiki/feature:Blacklist

"A blacklist is a feature which creates a list of urls recognized to
be spam which cannot be added to wiki pages. This can either be hosted
directly on that wiki, or be an extension that you can add (in the
case of MediaWiki) which imports a list maintained elsewhere. It
prevents these urls from being saved on any page in the wiki, thus
preventing spam from some of the worst known bad actors. A blacklist
can be a very effective tool for fighting spam, but requires consensus
on what urls constitute spam among the community. "

Here is our related wish:
http://dev.tiki.org/wish2919

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Xavier de Pedro
<xav...@vh...> wrote:
> Wohooo! :-)
> Congrats. everyone!!!
> Nice to see this type of review every now and then.
>
> When they said that we don't have "blacklisting", they might have
> skipped the Admin Banning feature...
>
> Cheers
>
> Xavi
>
> On 14/02/14 17:59, Alexander Mette wrote:
>> Hi everybuddy,
>>
>> Germany's well-respected computer magazine c't (of heise fame) has an
>> article on wiki software and chose Tiki as one of five to evaluate. They
>> say themselves that the big heyday of wikis is over, so this is not a
>> massive test, more like a round-up of what does the wiki world look like
>> now that it's more than fifteen years old. So, I'd say that even to be
>> chosen is quite good already! And in the end... we do look damn sexy
>> imho! :)
>>
>> They speak about our monolithic no-addon-no-cry concept and do like the
>> results despite all scepticism towards such all-in-one-solutions. They
>> think we manage to organise the flood of features quite well and call
>> the new admin wizard "clever" (it's even worth a screen shot). Our
>> plethora of wiki plug-ins is worth mentioning as well as the "well
>> defined lifecycle of the product" with regular updates and LTS versions.
>> In the end they put us in the enterprise wiki corner and the comparison
>> chart makes us look quite good, too.
>>
>> Here's a scan of the article:
>>       http://dl.amette.eu/2014-02-ct-Wiki-Software.pdf
>>
>> Congrats to everyone involved in creating this wonderful product. Kick
>> back a bit, feel praised and grab a beer - you've earned it! :)
>>
>> cheers
>> amette
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Android apps run on BlackBerry 10
> Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps.
> Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more.
> Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience.  Start now.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> TikiWiki-devel mailing list
> Tik...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel



-- 
Marc Laporte

http://MarcLaporte.com
http://Tiki.org/MarcLaporte
http://AvanTech.net

Re: [Tiki-de] [Tikiwiki-users] [Tiki-devel] Tiki in Germany's c't magazine

[Xavier de P. <xav...@vh...>]

Yes, Marc, you are right.

In our case, some of us have a list (maintained elsewhere) that we can
import to the admin banning. It's not perfect, but, in some cases, it
helped to reduce spam when we got those spam waves years ago, etc. But
definitively, the passcode (or a compulsory pair of fields from a
dynamic-items-list in the registration user tracker) were more effective.

In addition to this topic, see also the plugin proposed in the devel
list: checkipwithstopforumspam
http://sourceforge.net/p/tikiwiki/mailman/message/31075768/

Xavi

On 18/02/14 18:40, Marc Laporte wrote:
> This is the definition on WikiMatrix:
> http://www.wikimatrix.org/wiki/feature:Blacklist
>
> "A blacklist is a feature which creates a list of urls recognized to
> be spam which cannot be added to wiki pages. This can either be hosted
> directly on that wiki, or be an extension that you can add (in the
> case of MediaWiki) which imports a list maintained elsewhere. It
> prevents these urls from being saved on any page in the wiki, thus
> preventing spam from some of the worst known bad actors. A blacklist
> can be a very effective tool for fighting spam, but requires consensus
> on what urls constitute spam among the community. "
>
> Here is our related wish:
> http://dev.tiki.org/wish2919
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Xavier de Pedro
> <xav...@vh...> wrote:
>> Wohooo! :-)
>> Congrats. everyone!!!
>> Nice to see this type of review every now and then.
>>
>> When they said that we don't have "blacklisting", they might have
>> skipped the Admin Banning feature...
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Xavi
>>
>> On 14/02/14 17:59, Alexander Mette wrote:
>>> Hi everybuddy,
>>>
>>> Germany's well-respected computer magazine c't (of heise fame) has an
>>> article on wiki software and chose Tiki as one of five to evaluate. They
>>> say themselves that the big heyday of wikis is over, so this is not a
>>> massive test, more like a round-up of what does the wiki world look like
>>> now that it's more than fifteen years old. So, I'd say that even to be
>>> chosen is quite good already! And in the end... we do look damn sexy
>>> imho! :)
>>>
>>> They speak about our monolithic no-addon-no-cry concept and do like the
>>> results despite all scepticism towards such all-in-one-solutions. They
>>> think we manage to organise the flood of features quite well and call
>>> the new admin wizard "clever" (it's even worth a screen shot). Our
>>> plethora of wiki plug-ins is worth mentioning as well as the "well
>>> defined lifecycle of the product" with regular updates and LTS versions.
>>> In the end they put us in the enterprise wiki corner and the comparison
>>> chart makes us look quite good, too.
>>>
>>> Here's a scan of the article:
>>>       http://dl.amette.eu/2014-02-ct-Wiki-Software.pdf
>>>
>>> Congrats to everyone involved in creating this wonderful product. Kick
>>> back a bit, feel praised and grab a beer - you've earned it! :)
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> amette
>>

Re: [Tiki-de] [Tikiwiki-users] [Tiki-devel] Tiki in Germany's c't magazine

[Marc L. <ma...@ma...>]

+1 to get that in the official code base.

I think it should be an official feature with a check box in the admin
panel instead of a plugin.

Right now, it requires to set up a User Tracker but folks need this
protection even when not needing User Trackers.

Tom: Do you need help?

Best regards,

M :-)
On Feb 26, 2014 3:21 PM, "Xavier de Pedro" <xav...@vh...> wrote:

> Yes, Marc, you are right.
>
> In our case, some of us have a list (maintained elsewhere) that we can
> import to the admin banning. It's not perfect, but, in some cases, it
> helped to reduce spam when we got those spam waves years ago, etc. But
> definitively, the passcode (or a compulsory pair of fields from a
> dynamic-items-list in the registration user tracker) were more effective.
>
> In addition to this topic, see also the plugin proposed in the devel
> list: checkipwithstopforumspam
> http://sourceforge.net/p/tikiwiki/mailman/message/31075768/
>
> Xavi
>
> On 18/02/14 18:40, Marc Laporte wrote:
> > This is the definition on WikiMatrix:
> > http://www.wikimatrix.org/wiki/feature:Blacklist
> >
> > "A blacklist is a feature which creates a list of urls recognized to
> > be spam which cannot be added to wiki pages. This can either be hosted
> > directly on that wiki, or be an extension that you can add (in the
> > case of MediaWiki) which imports a list maintained elsewhere. It
> > prevents these urls from being saved on any page in the wiki, thus
> > preventing spam from some of the worst known bad actors. A blacklist
> > can be a very effective tool for fighting spam, but requires consensus
> > on what urls constitute spam among the community. "
> >
> > Here is our related wish:
> > http://dev.tiki.org/wish2919
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Xavier de Pedro
> > <xav...@vh...> wrote:
> >> Wohooo! :-)
> >> Congrats. everyone!!!
> >> Nice to see this type of review every now and then.
> >>
> >> When they said that we don't have "blacklisting", they might have
> >> skipped the Admin Banning feature...
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Xavi
> >>
> >> On 14/02/14 17:59, Alexander Mette wrote:
> >>> Hi everybuddy,
> >>>
> >>> Germany's well-respected computer magazine c't (of heise fame) has an
> >>> article on wiki software and chose Tiki as one of five to evaluate.
> They
> >>> say themselves that the big heyday of wikis is over, so this is not a
> >>> massive test, more like a round-up of what does the wiki world look
> like
> >>> now that it's more than fifteen years old. So, I'd say that even to be
> >>> chosen is quite good already! And in the end... we do look damn sexy
> >>> imho! :)
> >>>
> >>> They speak about our monolithic no-addon-no-cry concept and do like the
> >>> results despite all scepticism towards such all-in-one-solutions. They
> >>> think we manage to organise the flood of features quite well and call
> >>> the new admin wizard "clever" (it's even worth a screen shot). Our
> >>> plethora of wiki plug-ins is worth mentioning as well as the "well
> >>> defined lifecycle of the product" with regular updates and LTS
> versions.
> >>> In the end they put us in the enterprise wiki corner and the comparison
> >>> chart makes us look quite good, too.
> >>>
> >>> Here's a scan of the article:
> >>>       http://dl.amette.eu/2014-02-ct-Wiki-Software.pdf
> >>>
> >>> Congrats to everyone involved in creating this wonderful product. Kick
> >>> back a bit, feel praised and grab a beer - you've earned it! :)
> >>>
> >>> cheers
> >>> amette
> >>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
> Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer
> Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports.
> Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> TikiWiki-users mailing list
> Tik...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-users
>