Re: [threeten-develop] CLDR 'y' vs 'u'

[Masayoshi O. <mas...@or...>]

No, I don't at this point.

Masayoshi

On 2/13/2013 12:32 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 15:13, roger riggs <rog...@or...> wrote:
>> Can we work on getting the issues around 'y' and 'u' in the formatter
>> solved.
>> That fix is needed to enable the CLDR 'u' printing of the proleptic year
>> and to remove some hardcoded chronology references.
>> As suggested  in issue #64, following the CLDR usage for 'u' is preferred.
>>
>> #138 mentions most of the history.  It looks like there is no handling of
>> YEAR_OF_ERA
>> or ERA in DateTimeBuilder.
> Does Masayoshi have any more changes planned in DateTimeBuilder?
>
> Stephen