|
From: nik g. <ni...@f0...> - 2002-05-09 15:36:22
|
NOTE: http://libarynth.f0.am/cgi-bin/view/Libarynth/ProjectTxoomWearables > it seems that the data coming into oz from one of our wearable > assembly is too stepped: as we rotate the sensor slowly, the data > does not change smoothly with the sensor, but instead jumps at > approximately 1 second intervals to successive values. i have to > look more carefully at the std out from operate on the ipaq, but it > could be that this sounds like a sensor conenciton problem. do you have TWO sensors connected to the stamp/pic-box ?+ check the sensor input with the following command on the ipaq cat /dev/ttySA0 should see a stream of raw sensor bytes + channel numbers. see previous post on thsi topic -> (quote w/ spelling corrections!) > > our gvu lab rates seem slow -- only > > a few vectors / sec from the one single! ipaq. what factors control > > or limit the frequency of data from the accelerometer to 802.11b? > > (wasn't that a rate fixed at the pic, or does that depend on > > available 802.11b speeds/bandwidth? > > we had some very unusual fluctuations in network behaviour in torino. > generally it worked better at night, perhaps excessive radiation during the > day? badly configured cell network? if you are getting only a few samples > per second, it might be a sensor or pic problemm since stocks version waits > quite a while (tens of milliseconds) between sensor channels if no data is > sent from the sensor. make sure both sensors are plugged into the pic, and > that they are both working sensors. > > > our little 802.11b network runs only the ipaqs and a mac airport on a > > pc. there's a second mac airport card but that's built into the oz > > mac in order for it to get around some draconian sysad restrictions > > on our wireless usage. > > have a look at some of the wireless monitoring thruput/frame dropping rates more at http://libarynth.f0.am/cgi-bin/view/Libarynth/ProjectTxoomWearables please consult/append/modify > (1) the data stream is interrupted somewhere on the > accelerometer-pic-ipaq chain, > and > (2) some code (in the ipaq?) is repeating fossil data (which would > be wrong! -- we want sensor to push data) > > Q1. i recall that the data acquisition and rebroadcast code (on > ipaq) was built to poll at a regular cloack rate. where is that > rate set, and what was it? > > Q2. what could possibly affect this slow, delayed episodic > response to changes in the sensor ? > > we put every mac on a hub disconncetd from the ambient net, so they > see only one another. the only difference is that i'n using an > Airport base station to send data htough it's tittanium. > > and > > Q3. what can we do to speed up the frequency? > > please help, any suggesions? more at http://libarynth.f0.am/cgi-bin/view/Libarynth/ProjectTxoomWearables |