You can subscribe to this list here.
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(38) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(51) |
2013 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(8) |
2014 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(28) |
2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(36) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(26) |
2016 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
2017 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(7) |
2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2012-11-26 18:39:05
|
Le lundi 26/11/12 à 19h00, Tim Hoffmann <hof...@hi...> a écrit : > > Your life would be simpler with it :) > Well, so far I was quite happy with our internal build system :) For large documents with bibliographies, glossaries, indexes (like theses for instance :) I guess the TXS internal build system would not be as efficient as latexmk and you wouldn't have the guarantee of a real up to date documents. For this matter, latexmk is really powerful (but OK, latexmk is very bad for editing .tex files: every man to his own trade ;) > >> so I'm not familiar with the options. Would it > >> make sense to have an additional > >> latexmk % > >> next to the other settings (maybe also as default)? > > If "%" stands for the current (master) .tex file, yes: once again, a > > user who decides to make use of latexmk is enough experienced to > > know what he is doing and how the latexmk default behaviour can be > > changed. > Not necessarily. Take me for an example. If I now switch to latexmk > because of your recommendation, I have no clue which options exist > (and I probably won't start reading the doc beforehand). Yes, but I advised it to you because you are not a beginner :) > So I would > be happy to have reasonable defaults. OK. The latexmk default compiler is latex so a dvi output file. I guess that if you doesn't want dvi file and/or if your file couldn't be compiled with dvi output (for instance because of .png or .pdf graphic files), you will, as a non beginner, understand what's going on and search either in the doc or on the Web how to get a pdf output. > That may be the bare command, but not necessarily. For example the > default pdflatex has additional options "-synctex=1 > -interaction=nonstopmode" in TXS, which is reasonable. > > Now I can't judge on latexmk, but I think there was some reason that > Benito or Jan chose these options. > > In short, I can additionally put "latexmk %" into the selection. Yes thanks. > But someone else has to decide which command should be default. What could be nice would be to add hints to make these commands a bit more explicit: 1. "latexmk %" Default behaviour, takes in account possible customized initialization file (e.g. "latexmkrc" or ".latexmkrc") --- see latexmk documentation. 2. latexmk -dvi -silent -latex="latex -src %%O %%S" % Dvi output. 3. latexmk -pdf -silent -pdflatex="pdflatex -synctex=1 %%O %%S" % Pdf output. -- Denis |
From: Tim H. <hof...@hi...> - 2012-11-26 18:00:30
|
Am 26.11.2012 18:30, schrieb Denis Bitouzé: > Le lundi 26/11/12 à 17h58, > Tim Hoffmann <hof...@hi...> a écrit : > >> I don't use latexmk, > Your life would be simpler with it :) Well, so far I was quite happy with our internal build system :) >> so I'm not familiar with the options. Would it >> make sense to have an additional >> latexmk % >> next to the other settings (maybe also as default)? > If "%" stands for the current (master) .tex file, yes: once again, a > user who decides to make use of latexmk is enough experienced to know > what he is doing and how the latexmk default behaviour can be changed. Not necessarily. Take me for an example. If I now switch to latexmk because of your recommendation, I have no clue which options exist (and I probably won't start reading the doc beforehand). So I would be happy to have reasonable defaults. That may be the bare command, but not necessarily. For example the default pdflatex has additional options "-synctex=1 -interaction=nonstopmode" in TXS, which is reasonable. Now I can't judge on latexmk, but I think there was some reason that Benito or Jan chose these options. In short, I can additionally put "latexmk %" into the selection. But someone else has to decide which command should be default. |
From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2012-11-26 17:30:24
|
Le lundi 26/11/12 à 17h58, Tim Hoffmann <hof...@hi...> a écrit : > I don't use latexmk, Your life would be simpler with it :) > so I'm not familiar with the options. Would it > make sense to have an additional > latexmk % > next to the other settings (maybe also as default)? If "%" stands for the current (master) .tex file, yes: once again, a user who decides to make use of latexmk is enough experienced to know what he is doing and how the latexmk default behaviour can be changed. -- Denis |
From: Tim H. <hof...@hi...> - 2012-11-26 16:58:57
|
Am 26.11.2012 17:39, schrieb Denis Bitouzé: > Le lundi 26/11/12 à 17h37, > Tim Hoffmann <hof...@hi...> a écrit : > >> You can edit this in Config -> Commands and set your own parameters. > Yes, I know that but, IMHO, latexmk should be agnostic by default. I don't use latexmk, so I'm not familiar with the options. Would it make sense to have an additional latexmk % next to the other settings (maybe also as default)? |
From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2012-11-26 16:39:11
|
Le lundi 26/11/12 à 17h37, Tim Hoffmann <hof...@hi...> a écrit : > You can edit this in Config -> Commands and set your own parameters. Yes, I know that but, IMHO, latexmk should be agnostic by default. -- Denis |
From: Tim H. <hof...@hi...> - 2012-11-26 16:37:47
|
Am 26.11.2012 17:08, schrieb Denis Bitouzé: > Hello, > > currently, latexmk is in TXS supposed to make use of pdftex with either > dvi or pdf output: > > latexmk -dvi -silent -latex="latex -src %%O %%S" % > latexmk -pdf -silent -pdflatex="pdflatex -synctex=1 %%O %%S" % You can edit this in Config -> Commands and set your own parameters. > If the user wants different settings, either in command line or stored > in a .latexmkrc file, he needs to create a personal user command: > > latexmk % > > just for this. IMHO, it should be preferable to make latexmk agnostic > and let the user adjust its settings by himself (anyhow, a user who > makes use of latexmk is not a beginner and knows what he's doing). > > Cheers. |
From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2012-11-26 16:08:18
|
Hello, currently, latexmk is in TXS supposed to make use of pdftex with either dvi or pdf output: latexmk -dvi -silent -latex="latex -src %%O %%S" % latexmk -pdf -silent -pdflatex="pdflatex -synctex=1 %%O %%S" % If the user wants different settings, either in command line or stored in a .latexmkrc file, he needs to create a personal user command: latexmk % just for this. IMHO, it should be preferable to make latexmk agnostic and let the user adjust its settings by himself (anyhow, a user who makes use of latexmk is not a beginner and knows what he's doing). Cheers. -- Denis |
From: Matthias P. <mat...@gm...> - 2012-11-25 10:35:53
|
Am 20.11.2012 21:14, schrieb sunderme: > tex! root support has only been added some revisions ago. It only > works, if the option is activated that documents are automatically > loaded. Without that option, tex root is without effect. Is there a binary available for testing? If it is required that documents are loaded for this, then 'tex root' is very different than how it is interpreted in all other editors. There it does not matter if the document is loaded. Matthias |
From: Denis B. <dbi...@wa...> - 2012-11-25 10:02:08
|
Hi, there's a typo ("verrsion" > "version)" in the recent following string to be translated: "in a recent is currently not possible because a modified verrsion..." Best regards. -- Denis |
From: John F. <fr...@tc...> - 2012-11-20 20:40:53
|
Have a read of section 4.1 of the TeXstudio manual (version 2.5). TeXstudio manages parent-child relationships in a completely different way to TeXworks. Best regards John On 20 November 2012 18:35, Matthias Pospiech <mat...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > before I start a bug report, I would like to know if I do something > principle wrong. > > I have a file > template/doc/documentation.tex > which is a sub file of the main file > template/doc/TemplateDocumentation.tex > > Therefore I added to documentation.tex the header: > % !TeX root = ./../TemplateDocumentation.tex > > However this is completely ignored. > > Any ideas why ? > > Matthias > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list > -- John C Frain, Ph.D. Trinity College Dublin Dublin 2 Ireland www.tcd.ie/Economics/staff/frainj/home.htm mailto:fr...@tc... mailto:fr...@gm... |
From: sunderme <sun...@gm...> - 2012-11-20 20:15:20
|
tex! root support has only been added some revisions ago. It only works, if the option is activated that documents are automatically loaded. Without that option, tex root is without effect. JanMatthias Pospiech <mat...@gm...> hat geschrieben:Hello, before I start a bug report, I would like to know if I do something principle wrong. I have a file template/doc/documentation.tex which is a sub file of the main file template/doc/TemplateDocumentation.tex Therefore I added to documentation.tex the header: % !TeX root = ./../TemplateDocumentation.tex However this is completely ignored. Any ideas why ? Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ TeXstudio-list mailing list TeX...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Matthias P. <mat...@gm...> - 2012-11-20 18:36:02
|
Hello, before I start a bug report, I would like to know if I do something principle wrong. I have a file template/doc/documentation.tex which is a sub file of the main file template/doc/TemplateDocumentation.tex Therefore I added to documentation.tex the header: % !TeX root = ./../TemplateDocumentation.tex However this is completely ignored. Any ideas why ? Matthias |
From: Benedikt B. <ma...@be...> - 2012-10-30 11:50:25
|
At first start after installation TexStudio runs some tests and checks. On my linux installations the LatexCompleterTest fails with the output given below. This happens on several Linux machines (2x ubuntu 12.04, 1x openSUSE 12.2), as I don't have any Windows machine a reach to check, I cannot tell if it happens there too. Indeed I get sometimes an autocompleted \begin{addmargin} at position where I didn't intend any autocomplettion at all. Is this already known? Thx Benedikt Output of the test routine (shortened to the erronous part): *** THERE SEEM TO BE FAILED TESTS! *** <snip> ********* Start testing of LatexCompleterTest ********* Config: Using QTest library 4.8.1, Qt 4.8.1 PASS : LatexCompleterTest::initTestCase() FAIL! : LatexCompleterTest::simple(simple) '(ist)==(text)' returned FALSE. (equal failed: got ">>\abstractname*<<" !=expected ">>\abstractname{*}<<" ) Loc: [tests/latexcompleter_t.cpp(286)] FAIL! : LatexCompleterTest::simple(begin) '(ist)==(text)' returned FALSE. (equal failed: got ">>\begin{addmargin*<<" !=expected ">>\begin{align*<<" ) Loc: [tests/latexcompleter_t.cpp(286)] FAIL! : LatexCompleterTest::simple(begin +pc) '(ist)==(text)' returned FALSE. (equal failed: got ">>\begin{addmargin*<<" !=expected ">>\begin{align*<<" ) Loc: [tests/latexcompleter_t.cpp(286)] FAIL! : LatexCompleterTest::simple(begin multiple {{ +ec0) '(ist)==(text)' returned FALSE. (equal failed: got ">>\begin{addmargin}{<<" !=expected ">>\begin{alignat}{<<" ) Loc: [tests/latexcompleter_t.cpp(286)] FAIL! : LatexCompleterTest::simple(begin multiple {{ +ec1) '(ist)==(text)' returned FALSE. (equal failed: got ">>\begin{addmargin}{<<" !=expected ">>\begin{alignat}{<<" ) Loc: [tests/latexcompleter_t.cpp(286)] PASS : LatexCompleterTest::cleanupTestCase() Totals: 2 passed, 5 failed, 0 skipped ********* Finished testing of LatexCompleterTest ********* Time: 827 ms <snip> |
From: Markus S. <mar...@bl...> - 2012-10-29 20:50:23
|
Benito I stopped the firewall and restarted it and now LanguageTool is working. I do not really understand what is going on but for whatever reason this helped. Many thanks anyway for your support and your great tool. Regards Markus _____ Von: Benito van der Zander [mailto:be...@be...] Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2012 20:47 An: tex...@li... Betreff: Re: [TeXstudio-list] TXS 2.5 with LanguageTool 1.9 not grammarchecking Hi, I think it should work with your settings. Can you start the LT gui from the command line, before running txs? Then it should print, how much text it is checking. Or run a network sniffer on localhost to log the packets txs sends? (might be difficult on Windows, perhaps use your network address instead of localhost in the LT/TXS config) Have you checked the Anzeige\Grammatikfehler\Grammatikfehler option? If it is not checked the errors are not displayed. * I see that a java process gets forked in TaskManager when TXS gets started That's good So LanguageTool is listening. The java exception is probably due to the malformed url. yes * I added % ! TeX encoding = UTF-8 % ! TeX spellcheck = de_DE to my document that might help, but it should even work without * When executing LanguageToolGUI.jar and typing in the same sentence I used in TXS it gets correctly grammar checked Which sentence? How did the document in txs look? Benito On 10/28/2012 12:29 PM, Markus Sonderegger wrote: Can anybody point me to the error I do when trying to configure grammar checking in TXS? I am a german speaking user of TXS and LanguageTool and my regional settings are German ( Switzerland ). * I see that a java process gets forked in TaskManager when TXS gets started * I changed the option in LanguageTool saying that it should run on ServerPort 8081 and my mother language being german * Pointing my IE to http://localhost:8081/ shows Error: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Missing 'text' parameter at org.languagetool.server.LanguageToolHttpHandler.handle(LanguageToolHttpHandl er.java:73) . So LanguageTool is listening. The java exception is probably due to the malformed url. * I added % ! TeX encoding = UTF-8 % ! TeX spellcheck = de_DE to my document * When executing LanguageToolGUI.jar and typing in the same sentence I used in TXS it gets correctly grammar checked Any help is greatly appreciated Regards Markus ----------------------------------- Dr. Markus Sonderegger Jonenstr. 28 CH-8913 Ottenbach Privat +41 44 761 21 06 Mobile +41 79 698 09 79 E-Mail <mailto:mar...@bl...> mar...@bl... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ _______________________________________________ TeXstudio-list mailing list TeX...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Benito v. d. Z. <be...@be...> - 2012-10-28 19:41:28
|
Hi, I think it should work with your settings. Can you start the LT gui from the command line, before running txs? Then it should print, how much text it is checking. Or run a network sniffer on localhost to log the packets txs sends? (might be difficult on Windows, perhaps use your network address instead of localhost in the LT/TXS config) Have you checked the Anzeige\Grammatikfehler\Grammatikfehler option? If it is not checked the errors are not displayed. > * I see that a java process gets forked in TaskManager when TXS gets > started > That's good > > So LanguageTool is listening. The java exception is probably due to > the malformed url. yes > * I added % ! TeX encoding = UTF-8 % ! TeX spellcheck = de_DE to my > document > that might help, but it should even work without > > * When executing LanguageToolGUI.jar and typing in the same sentence > I used in TXS it gets correctly grammar checked > Which sentence? How did the document in txs look? Benito On 10/28/2012 12:29 PM, Markus Sonderegger wrote: > > Can anybody point me to the error I do when trying to configure > grammar checking in TXS? > > I am a german speaking user of TXS and LanguageTool and my regional > settings are German ( Switzerland ). > > * I see that a java process gets forked in TaskManager when TXS gets > started > * I changed the option in LanguageTool saying that it should run on > ServerPort 8081 and my mother language being german > * Pointing my IE to http://localhost:8081/ shows Error: > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Missing 'text' parameter at > org.languagetool.server.LanguageToolHttpHandler.handle(LanguageToolHttpHandler.java:73) > ... > So LanguageTool is listening. The java exception is probably due > to the malformed url. > * I added % ! TeX encoding = UTF-8 % ! TeX spellcheck = de_DE to my > document > * When executing LanguageToolGUI.jar and typing in the same sentence > I used in TXS it gets correctly grammar checked > > Any help is greatly appreciated > > Regards > > Markus > > ----------------------------------- > > Dr. Markus Sonderegger > > Jonenstr. 28 > > CH-8913 Ottenbach > > Privat +41 44 761 21 06 > > Mobile +41 79 698 09 79 > > E-Mail mar...@bl... > <mailto:mar...@bl...> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > WINDOWS 8 is here. > Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. > Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. > http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ > join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ > > > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Markus S. <mar...@bl...> - 2012-10-28 11:29:14
|
Can anybody point me to the error I do when trying to configure grammar checking in TXS? I am a german speaking user of TXS and LanguageTool and my regional settings are German (Switzerland). * I see that a java process gets forked in TaskManager when TXS gets started * I changed the option in LanguageTool saying that it should run on ServerPort 8081 and my mother language being german * Pointing my IE to http://localhost:8081/ shows Error: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Missing 'text' parameter at org.languagetool.server.LanguageToolHttpHandler.handle(LanguageToolHttpHandl er.java:73) . So LanguageTool is listening. The java exception is probably due to the malformed url. * I added % !TeX encoding = UTF-8 % !TeX spellcheck = de_DE to my document * When executing LanguageToolGUI.jar and typing in the same sentence I used in TXS it gets correctly grammar checked Any help is greatly appreciated Regards Markus ----------------------------------- Dr. Markus Sonderegger Jonenstr. 28 CH-8913 Ottenbach Privat +41 44 761 21 06 Mobile +41 79 698 09 79 E-Mail <mailto:mar...@bl...> mar...@bl... |
From: Tim H. <hof...@hi...> - 2012-10-25 15:32:50
|
Wizards -> Math Assistant Von: Xiaodong Qi [mailto:e2...@gm...] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2012 17:00 An: tex...@li... Betreff: Re: [TeXstudio-list] TeXstudio-list Digest, Vol 15, Issue 1 Hi developers, It said that the Win 7 user can now use TexTablet for handwritting recognization. But I can't find where is the button to push TexTablet working. Let me how to. Thanks for your nice work. Cheers, Xiaodong |
From: Jan S. <sun...@gm...> - 2012-10-25 15:31:41
|
Please give an exact example with a step-by-step description how to produce the erroneous behavior. Am 25.10.2012 17:07, schrieb Xiaodong Qi: > > Hi developers, > > I am using the automatical parentheses completement function. I found > that when the parentheses environment is complex, there are often some > errors. To concrete, in the case that there have been many parentheses > loops, if you input another curly brace pair in the deep middle, the > right-side pair of braces cannot be created automatically. Please > check and fix. Thanks. > > Take care, > Xiaodong > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > > > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Xiaodong Qi <e2...@gm...> - 2012-10-25 15:07:23
|
Hi developers, I am using the automatical parentheses completement function. I found that when the parentheses environment is complex, there are often some errors. To concrete, in the case that there have been many parentheses loops, if you input another curly brace pair in the deep middle, the right-side pair of braces cannot be created automatically. Please check and fix. Thanks. Take care, Xiaodong |
From: Xiaodong Qi <e2...@gm...> - 2012-10-25 15:00:21
|
Hi developers, It said that the Win 7 user can now use TexTablet for handwritting recognization. But I can't find where is the button to push TexTablet working. Let me how to. Thanks for your nice work. Cheers, Xiaodong |
From: Jan S. <sun...@gm...> - 2012-10-24 19:34:02
|
I will probably correct that issue on the next week-end. Am 22.10.2012 21:55, schrieb Benedikt Bauer: > The Texstudio versions on the Opensuse Build Service Repository > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jsundermeyer/ > seem to be misleading for the pakage manager. There is a version 2.5.1 > from 13-Sep-2012 which seems to be some 2.4-SVN version and a version > 2.5 from 15-Oct-2012 which is the real new Texstudio 2.5. As the > 2.4-SVN version number is greater than the 2.5 version number, my > package manager doesn't automatically update to the new 2.5, as it > thinks that it already has the newest version. > > Is this intended for some reason? The openSUSE package is verisonned > 2.5.2 and therefore the update works without any problems. > > Thx > Benedikt > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Benedikt B. <ma...@be...> - 2012-10-22 19:55:58
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 The Texstudio versions on the Opensuse Build Service Repository http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jsundermeyer/ seem to be misleading for the pakage manager. There is a version 2.5.1 from 13-Sep-2012 which seems to be some 2.4-SVN version and a version 2.5 from 15-Oct-2012 which is the real new Texstudio 2.5. As the 2.4-SVN version number is greater than the 2.5 version number, my package manager doesn't automatically update to the new 2.5, as it thinks that it already has the newest version. Is this intended for some reason? The openSUSE package is verisonned 2.5.2 and therefore the update works without any problems. Thx Benedikt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlCFpLcACgkQ8zH5kPFS02FB0wD/U3oBJoD0iG6Swr6OPtZ+BHpA 7QmamLfwVB8N3vCcWCEBALBuXLB1Et34aQhy4YQOL7sGq4Ef7k8g87x2s7mmj7Bq =5Iet -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Tim H. <hof...@hi...> - 2012-10-14 10:24:47
|
The next version will be 2.5.0 Changes can be found in the Changelog: http://texstudio.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/texstudio/trunk/utilities/CHANGE LOG.txt?revision=3364&view=markup Or, in more details, in the SVN log. > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Matthias Pospiech [mailto:mat...@gm...] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Oktober 2012 09:58 > An: tex...@li... > Betreff: Re: [TeXstudio-list] Update translations for next release > > Am 09.10.2012 23:55, schrieb Tim Hoffmann: > > Dear translators, > > > > we want to release version 2.5 of TXS soon. Please update the > > translations if possible until the end of the week. Updated .ts files are on the > SVN. > Do you really mean 2.5 or 2.4.1? > > What has happend in the development since 2.4.0 ? > > Best Regards, > Matthias > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM > Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is > happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at > no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |
From: Matthias P. <mat...@gm...> - 2012-10-14 07:57:40
|
Am 09.10.2012 23:55, schrieb Tim Hoffmann: > Dear translators, > > we want to release version 2.5 of TXS soon. Please update the translations > if possible until the end of the week. Updated .ts files are on the SVN. Do you really mean 2.5 or 2.4.1? What has happend in the development since 2.4.0 ? Best Regards, Matthias |
From: Tim H. <hof...@hi...> - 2012-10-12 10:35:26
|
Dear translators, 1. Due to an error zh_ZN and pt_BR translation files (.ts) were not updated. This is fixed now. If you translate one of these languages, please update the missing translations. 2. Italian and Ukraine translations are heavily outdated. If there is no one willing to update these, we will no longer ship them with the next release. Please let me know, if you want to update any translations, so we can wait for them before the 2.5 release. Cheers, Tim > Von: Tim Hoffmann [mailto:hof...@hi...] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012 23:55 > > Dear translators, > > we want to release version 2.5 of TXS soon. Please update the translations if > possible until the end of the week. Updated .ts files are on the SVN. > > Cheers, > Tim > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM > Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is > happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at > no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > TeXstudio-list mailing list > TeX...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/texstudio-list |