#612 spacing problem in tied chords with accidentals

[Anonymous]

Originally created by: *anonymous

Originally created by: v.villenave

The accidental after the barline is shifted to the left as if to account for the accidental tied into the measure.

A work-around is to temporarily shift to accidental style 'no-reset.

\version "2.11.45"

\relative {
  <c' bes>1~
  <c bes ges>
}

[Google Importer]

Originally posted by: csnyd...@mvpsoft.com

I've put together a patch that addresses this issue:
http://codereview.appspot.com/28134

[Google Importer]

Originally posted by: lemzw...@googlemail.com

Still an issue with version 1.13.1 -- the patch hasn't been applied yet.
Is this an oversight?

For easier reference, I've added an image.

[Google Importer]

Originally posted by: gpermus@gmail.com

(No comment was entered for this change.)

Status: Started

[Google Importer]

Originally posted by: frederic...@gtempaccount.com

Same issue with 2.12.2 and 2.13.15 with two voices instead of a chord:

% the sharp of fis should be closer to the note head
% it is shifted to the left as if the sharp of the second cis was printed
\version "2.12.2"
<< { cis''1 ~  cis'' } \\ { eis' fis' } >>

[Google Importer]

Originally posted by: Carl.D.S...@gmail.com

The patch that csnyder put together on Rietveld got some feedback from Joe,
but never got finished.  The Rietveld issue is now closed.

Is this worth picking up again?

Labels: Patch

[Google Importer]

Originally posted by: csnyd...@mvpsoft.com

When my patch was discussed, it seemed to me that the powers-that-be concluded that it was the wrong approach and not worth fixing up: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00344.html

[Google Importer]

Originally posted by: percival.music.ca@gmail.com

Ok, I consider the patch officially not-to-be-used, so I'll revert this item to the default status.

Labels: -Patch
Owner: ---
Status: Accepted

[Anonymous]

n 08/09/15 14:56, David Kastrup wrote:

I can't see the described problems. It seems like they were last tested
with version 2.13.15 about 6 years ago, so they had a lot of opportunity
for getting fixed.

[Anonymous]

n 08/09/15 14:56, David Kastrup wrote:

I can't see the described problems. It seems like they were last tested
with version 2.13.15 about 6 years ago, so they had a lot of opportunity
for getting fixed.

[Phil Holmes]

Don't think it is fixed. With 2.19.23 the lower accidental is spaced away from its note to leave space for the sharp in the tied note above. Only problem is that the sharp isn't there since it's tied. Check the effect of changing cis->c