Tiny fixes for extractpdfmark
Individual changes:
1) Fix extractpdfmark not coming from PATH
If STEPMAKE_PROGS cannot find an optional program, it returns "false".
Checking for this value is better than requiring exactly "extractpdfmark"
which does not hold if the program is not in PATH and the user explicitly
sets the environment variable EXTRACTPDFMARK.
2) Fix extractpdfmark with GhostScript 9.50
GhostScript 9.50 defaults to -dSAFE, so the build system needs to pas
in -dNOSAFE explicitly.
3) Update message for optional extractpdfmark
From my experiments, enabling extractpdfmark rather increases the
required disk space. This is probably because the process produces
additional intermediate files. It only benefits the final PDF docs.
Diff:
Passes make, make test-baseline and a full make doc
rebase and adapt message
http://codereview.appspot.com/571420055
I only changed one string, please consider skipping another "review" phase.
"Jonas Hahnfeld" hahnjo@users.sourceforge.net writes:
James' job is primarily implementing a process, not having to make
decisions. If you consider skipping a step is warranted and you are
going to take responsibility for it, spell it out and do so.
It's worth noting that when Texinfo markup comes into play, inadvertant
misspellings may render documentation uncompilable. A change only in
text tends to be harmless in comparison.
--
David Kastrup
Diff:
Passes make, make test-baseline and a full make doc
Patch on countdown for Jan 31st.
Patch counted down - please push.
Pushed to staging as
Nope, this were the wrong commits :-( re-created
stagingwithout theseThe correct commits: