Menu
▾
▴
1 Attachments
#55 collision tie, accidental, and line break.
Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: gpermus@gmail.com
Originally owned by: gpermus@gmail.com
\version "2.9.18"
\header {
texidoc = "Accidentals can't be forced with ! and ? if the notes are tied.
Also, the ? moves the affected note to the right. "
reportedin = "2.7.35"
}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
}
\relative {
gis'4 ~ gis!~ gis?
}
Originally posted by: hanw...@gmail.com
Why would you want to do that? It's bad notation, and looks crappy because the tie
doesn't avoid the accidental. Anyways, fixed in CVS, but don't go complaining that
the tie collides with the acc.
Status: Fixed
Originally posted by: gpermus@gmail.com
I don't know why somebody would want to do that. Erik put it in the bug CVS, so I
put it here. :)
Originally posted by: gpermus@gmail.com
I don't know why somebody would want to do that. Erik put it in the bug CVS, so I
put it here. :)
Originally posted by: gpermus@gmail.com
I don't know why somebody would want to do that. Erik put it in the bug CVS, so I
put it here. :)
Originally posted by: gpermus@gmail.com
Verified 2.9.21
Status: Verified
Originally posted by: gpermus@gmail.com
Sorry Han-Wen, we _do_ have a valid complaint about tie/accidental collision. :)
\version "2.10.0"
\layout{ragged-right = ##t }
\relative c'''{ cis1 ~ \break cis }
Summary: collision tie, accidental, and line break.
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Collision
Status: Accepted
Originally posted by: hanw...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: fixed_2_11_12
Status: Fixed
Originally posted by: gpermus@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Verified