Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Originally owned by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Issue 3916: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures
A function to print a group of time signatures indicating a section
of music with (irregularly) changing meters.
Takes a list of lists, each sublist representing one time signature.
The first of the time signatures will be used to set the new effective
time signature, apart from that the function doesn't affect timing at all.
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Owner: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Patchy the autobot says: fails make - I haven't had time to find out why
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
It's definitely in the doc part. I just built it without the doc commit and it works.
I'll look into it.
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Fixing doc error
http://codereview.appspot.com/97110045
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-new
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
It wasn't failing on 'make doc' it was failing on just 'make'.
I'll retest the patch anyhow.
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Hm.
I use Janek's script to build lily, so I'm not sure if it's actually running make or what.
But when I first built it, it gave a failure, but somewhere during some documentation files.
When I reset it to the commit before the doc addition it ran without problems and built lily with the added functionality.
We'll see what your test will revel ...
Originally posted by: PhilEHol...@googlemail.com
Make does build some of the documentation and it's probably this causing patchy to fail. I'm guessing that Janek's scripts simply build the binary.
Originally posted by: ulidesi...@googlemail.com
I've inspected Janek's script and it sais
make $MAKE_OPTIONS
so it uses make with some options it has gathered.
_But_ with my initial patch it failed to build here too.
When checking out the commit without the doc it built, and with my modified patch it also builds _with_ it.
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Patchy the autobot says: passes make, make check and a full make docs.
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Doc needs rewording, as of http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-05/msg00064.html
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
rewording doc section
http://codereview.appspot.com/97110045
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-new
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
rewording doc section, now correctly rebased
http://codereview.appspot.com/97110045
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Patchy the autobot says: passes make, make check and a full make docs.
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
reword docs according to Trevor's suggestions
http://codereview.appspot.com/97110045
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-new
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Patchy the autobot says: passes make, make check and a full make docs.
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Change to \fractionList, add argument validation and the printing of hyphens
http://codereview.appspot.com/97110045
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-new
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Patchy the autobot says: passes make, make check and a full make docs.
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
I think this still needs work (can't tell for certain on the Reitveld thread) - else if not, then change the Label to Patch-countdown
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
I can't tell either if the _current_ patch needs work. Anyway it should wait until the discussion it triggered is finished. Then we'll see if the patch should be changed, can be used as is or has become obsolete.
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-waiting
Diff:
This patch seemed to be pretty well ready for pushing over 18 months ago, but discussion then ceased. Setting to Status:Accepted to allow someone else to pick it up.