Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
Originally owned by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
The last patch for issue 2527 changed the placement of dynamics around cross-staff beams. The dynamics avoid the beam in the less-common case where the beams are forced in the unusual direction, but increase collisions in the more-common case (first score below).
\score {<<
\new Staff = "up" {\tempo"Vivo Molto" s1 | }
\new Staff = "down" { \clef bass
<c,, c,>8 [ <c,, c,>8\f
\change Staff = "up" g' g'\! ] [r2] | }>>}
\score {<<
\new Staff = "up" {\tempo"Andantino" s1 | }
\new Staff = "down" { \clef bass
\stemDown
<c,, c,>8 [ <c,, c,>8\f
\change Staff = "up" g' g'\! ] [r2] | }>>}
\score {b'1}
Originally posted by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
Removing the obviously-relevant changes from issue 2527, the 'cross-staff' mark from NoteColumns that contain a cross-staff stem, causes problems like that in the image for issue 3385.
Before issue 2527, such NoteColumns were not marked 'cross-staff', and side-positioning would refer to the extents of the NoteColumn to avoid the note-heads and normal stems and beams, but ignore cross-staff stems and beams. Now, however, the side-positioning uses skylines, and getting even an estimate of the NoteColumn's skyline requires the stem directions to be set.
It was nice to have outside-staff objects be placed before staff-spacing, so these objects were in place and get space during staff-spacing. Getting that behavior back and working with the new side-positioning code is not as simple as I hoped.
Originally posted by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
I posted the combined set of patches for issue 3363 issue 3501 and this one, because they are so intertwined that it makes more sense to review the proposed final state, and if one of them fails, I'll drop all of them and start working on a revert of 2527.
One test fails, input/regression/dynamics-avoid-cross-staff-stem-2.ly
because that is the functionality we are removing. The middle system in the image at the top of the report is that test, and it goes back to the 2.16.2 output.
http://codereview.appspot.com/13167043
Originally posted by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: Patch-new
Originally posted by: mts...@gmail.com
Ok with your proposed solution and reverting back to the 2.16.2 behavior, as the fix caused even worse behavior.
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Passes Make, make check and make doc. Reg test diff attached
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Owner: k-ohara5...@oco.net
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-new
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Patchy the autobot says: passes tests.
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Originally posted by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
Adding one more related change, that came out of the discussion of issue 2527. It caused no regression-test changes for me, but if anyone can run the patch script to confirm this, I think that would be worthwhile.
http://codereview.appspot.com/13167043
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-new
Originally posted by: mts...@gmail.com
I'm getting a bunch of "old chunk mismatch" on the Ritveld issue in the side-by-side difs. But in general it looks good. So the basic idea is that grouping grobs should not be cross-staff?
Originally posted by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
Re-uploaded and now side-by-side diffs are visible.
The idea is that the specific grouping-grob type NoteColumn should not be marked 'cross-staff' because that particular grob handled internally the complexity of having some of its parts being cross-staff. Going back to that method seems the safest way to have everything working, and still keep the good changes for issue 2527.
Having NoteColumn check which of its parts are cross-staff solves issue 3385 as well -- I forgot to put that in the patch description until just now.
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Passes make, make check and a full make doc.
Reg test diff attached
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Patch on Countdown for August 27th - 06:00 GMT
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-countdown
Originally posted by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Started
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
Patch counted down, please push.
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Originally posted by: k-ohara5...@oco.net
commit [r7891600a5dd421c1f25776ea3b405c64f4f14752]
Labels: -Patch-push fixed_2_17_26
Status: Fixed
Originally posted by: Elu...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Verified