Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: v.villenave (code.google.com)
Originally owned by: v.villenave (code.google.com)
% another collision involving ties:
:::TeX
\version "2.11.38"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
}
\relative c'' {
f-- f~-- f~
}
Originally posted by: v.villenave (code.google.com)
New example from James Bailey:
{
c'''2~ c'''8\fermata [r8] [r4]
}
% the fermata collides with the tie.
Originally posted by: percival.music.ca@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Just another example of a - very standard - notation that causes a collision between Tie and articulation
Originally posted by: lilyli...@googlemail.com
\relative e'{
<e b'>2~-> <e b'>
}
Originally posted by: paconet.... (code.google.com)@gmail.com
if fermata can be considered as an articulation, this example shows a very hard collision:
\version "2.13.50"
{ b16_\fermata ~ b8 b16 }
Originally posted by: percival.music.ca@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: -type-Collision Type-Ugly
Diff:
No collisions at all in 2.19.27.
The order of the stack in the first example might be a different issue, but for ties I don’t think it need be different.