TestLily / Backup-2016-12-10 / #4919 Improve autobeaming of tuplets in 2/2 and 3/2 time

#4919 Improve autobeaming of tuplets in 2/2 and 3/2 time

Status: Started

Owner: Simon Albrecht

Labels: None

Needs:

Patch: needs_work

Type: Enhancement

Updated: 2016-07-30

Created: 2016-07-04

Creator: Simon Albrecht

Private: No

It seems like the default beaming rules in 2/2 and 3/2 time don’t really take tuplets into account. Having ten or more notes on one beam makes things really difficult to read, so I vote for beaming 1/20 notes (aka 16th quintuplets) 5 5 5 5 instead of 10 10, and 1/24 notes or 16th triplets 6 6 6 6 instead of 12 12.

Discussion

Simon Albrecht - 2016-07-04

http://codereview.appspot.com/303980043

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-04

Patch: new --> review
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-04

Passes make, make check and a full make doc.

Reg test diffs can be downloaded from here:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9nZ5LHV2Ds6Z1cyY3FBTVVrRkk

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-07

Leaving on Review - comments on Rietveld from David.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-11

Patch on countdown for July 14th - Simon can you (or anyone else) address David's comment (re: 'What would Gould do?')?

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-11

Patch: review --> countdown
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-14

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-14

There is a comment on Rietveld that hasn't been addressed from Dak.

I'll leave this on countdown.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Simon Albrecht - 2016-07-14

It’s OK. There has finally been some discussion on the user list, with controversial statements, and I couldn’t yet make a conclusion which way to take action.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-17

Patch: countdown --> review
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-17

I'll put this back to review.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-21

Patch: review --> countdown
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-21

Patch on countdown for July 24th

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-24

Patch: countdown --> review
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-24

Simon, David has some comments on Rietveld, I'll put this back to review for now.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-27

The comments on Rietveld haven't been addressed as yet so I'll leave this on review for one more countdown.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-30

Patch: review --> needs_work
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2016-07-30

No updated to the comments on Rietveld. They seem like genuine concerns to me (but feel free to override my decision) so I am setting this back to Needs_Work

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Improve autobeaming of tuplets in 2/2 and 3/2 time

Test issue tracker

Searches

Help

#4919 Improve autobeaming of tuplets in 2/2 and 3/2 time

Discussion