Menu

#39 collision flag notehead with polyphony

Accepted
nobody
None
abandoned
Ugly
2015-09-14
2006-09-20
Anonymous
No

Originally created by: *anonymous

Originally created by: *anonymous

Originally created by: gpermus@gmail.com

\version "2.9.16"
\header {
  texidoc = "Flag collides with notehead." 
  reportedin = "2.4.2"
}
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }

{
  << c''64 \\ c''2 >>
}
1 Attachments

Discussion

  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2008-05-30

    Originally posted by: v.villenave

    (Reproduced with 2.11.47)

     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2010-01-18

    Originally posted by: percival.music.ca@gmail.com

    (No comment was entered for this change.)

    Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-High
    Owner: ---

     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2011-01-10

    Originally posted by: nez...@gmail.com

    (No comment was entered for this change.)

    Labels: Patch

     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2011-01-10

    Originally posted by: k-ohara5...@oco.net

    Unfortunately, the horizontal shift to the left obscures the intent of simultaneous notes.  Simultaneous noteheads are usually placed as closely as possible.

    I think the desired output is either (1) a longer stem, or (2) moving the g64 to the right as if it were dotted (g64.).

    Mike has started over with a new patch to lengthen the stem, and we are working on making it lengthen in the correct situations.

     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2011-01-28

    Originally posted by: percival.music.ca@gmail.com

    Mike, was your patch in comment 3 a serious one?  I'm not certain where we stand on this particular issue... I suspect that various other changes (especially Keith's work on 1472) may change this.  And you're doing fantastic work on issue 37 right now, so I don't want to distract you by getting back into this issue.

    I'm going to mark the patch "needs work" for now, and when other stuff settles down, you can either revise the patch, or just put it on codereview.

    Labels: -Patch Patch-needs_work

     

    Related

    Issues: #37

  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2011-06-01

    Originally posted by: lemniska...@gmail.com

    Shouldn't shortening the flag be the desired solution? As we're going to have plenty of shortened flags available, this may be the most elegant one.

     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2011-06-26

    Originally posted by: PhilEHol...@googlemail.com

    Connor Harris has produced another example of colliding flags and noteheads:

    \relative c''{
      << { c4 b a2 } \\ { g'4 f8\noBeam f e2 }  >> \noBreak
      << c64 \\ c1 >>
    }
    
     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2011-08-20

    Originally posted by: percival.music.ca@gmail.com

    (No comment was entered for this change.)

    Labels: -type-Collision Type-Ugly

     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2011-10-03

    Originally posted by: ColinPKC...@gmail.com

    (No comment was entered for this change.)

    Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-abandoned

     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2011-12-08

    Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com

    (No comment was entered for this change.)

    Labels: -Priority-High

     
  • Google Importer

    Google Importer - 2012-01-26

    Originally posted by: Elu...@gmail.com

    here is another quite frequent flag notehead collision:

    \relative c' { <g' a>8 }

     
  • Simon Albrecht

    Simon Albrecht - 2015-09-14
    • Description has changed:

    Diff:

    --- old
    +++ new
    @@ -2,13 +2,16 @@
    
     *Originally created by:* [gpermus@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/gpermus@gmail.com/)
    
    -\header \{
    -texidoc = "Flag collides with notehead." 
    -reportedin = "2.4.2"
    -\}
    +~~~~
    +:::TeX
     \version "2.9.16"
    -\paper\{ragged-right=\#\#t\}
    +\header {
    +  texidoc = "Flag collides with notehead." 
    +  reportedin = "2.4.2"
    +}
    +\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
    
    -\{
    -&lt;&lt; c''64 \\\ c''2 &gt;&gt;
    -\}
    +{
    +  << c''64 \\ c''2 >>
    +}
    +~~~~
    
    • Needs: -->
     
  • Simon Albrecht

    Simon Albrecht - 2015-09-14
     

Log in to post a comment.