Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: lemzw...@googlemail.com
\version "2.9.28" \header { texidoc = " In the example below, lilypond chooses the wrong tie direction which can almost lead to a misinterpretation because the tie looks like a slur. " } \paper { ragged-right = ##t } \relative c' { <f d'> ~ <e f c'> } % EOF
Originally posted by: lemzw...@googlemail.com
Here an extended example, directly from the torture chamber.
This looks so weird that I'm increasing the priority.
\relative c' {
<f d'>( ~ <e f c'>)
}
Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-Medium
Originally posted by: lemzw...@googlemail.com
Another one. This time the ties almost cross.
\relative c' {
<f d'> ~ <e f c'> ~ <e f c'>
}
Originally posted by: hanw...@gmail.com
See issue #180
Related
Issues:
#180Originally posted by: hanw...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low
Originally posted by: hanw...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: fixed_2_11_12
Status: Fixed
Originally posted by: gpermus@gmail.com
I don't see the fixes in 2.11.12.
Status: Started
Originally posted by: hanw...@gmail.com
Actually, the fix got buried because it had other side-effects.
I noticed this when trying to add NEWS entries.
Originally posted by: v.villenave
(Still unfixed as of 2.11.47)
Labels: -fixed_2_11_12
Status: Accepted
Originally posted by: jameseli...@googlemail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Verified
Originally posted by: percival.music.ca@gmail.com
LOLwut?
"Verified" means "a programmer said it was fixed, and an independent person agrees that the issue was fixed". It doesn't mean "yeah, I agree with whatever the previous person said". We should never go directly from Accepted to Verified.
If this issue was magically fixed at some point between 2.11.12 and now, then mark it fixed with a comment that "it was fixed at some point", and then mark it Verified.
But I don't believe that is the case here.
Status: Accepted
Originally posted by: PhilEHol...@googlemail.com
Another example where there should be one tied note within a chord, but LilyPond typesets it as if it's a slur, which is wrong. This is a real example, not contrived, taken from "The Gondoliers".
<<
\new Staff {
\time 6/8
\clef "treble"
a''8 a''8 a''8 a''8 a''8 a''8
}
\new Staff {
\time 6/8
\clef "bass"
\voiceOne
< a c' f'>4. ~ < b c' e'>4.
}
>>
Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-High
Originally posted by: pkx1...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: -Priority-High
Originally posted by: lemzw...@googlemail.com
Because older images aren't shown online, here my three `tie-direction' examples compiled with a self-compiled 2.19.15-1-171-ge86b2ea. They are still as ugly as ever – actually, the very first example has become even uglier since the tie is unnecessarily far away from the note head.
Originally posted by: lemzw...@googlemail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Owner: ---
Diff: