#495 Allow <listRelation> in <biblStruct>

GREEN
closed-wont-fix
None
5(default)
2014-09-07
2014-01-29
No

Per a recent discussion on the TEI Listserv (http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1401&L=TEI-L&F=&S=&X=150AC25AEDD4356587&P=39647), I'd like to request that listRelation be allowed within biblStruct, as it currently is for bibl. It's unclear why this is not currently allowed.

Thanks in advance,

RM

Discussion

  • James Cummings

    James Cummings - 2014-05-19
    • assigned_to: Syd Bauman
     
  • James Cummings

    James Cummings - 2014-05-19

    Assigning to Syd Bauman to triage and report to council, etc.

     
  • Peter Stadler

    Peter Stadler - 2014-07-01
    • Group: AMBER --> GREEN
     
  • Peter Stadler

    Peter Stadler - 2014-07-01

    Council decided to reject the feature request as per Oxford meeting 2014-07-01. Reasons are:

    • there are already (at least) two ways of linking <biblStruct>s: <relatedItem> and <link>
    • <bibl> can nest (therefore acts as a list), hence is not in parallel with <biblStruct>

    BUT, Council decided to add <listRelation> into <listBibl> for consistency with other list*

     
  • Syd Bauman

    Syd Bauman - 2014-09-07

    Closing this ticket “won’t fix” per tcm60 (minutes from 2014-06-30/07-02 Council meeting), and have add "( listRelation | relation )*" to end of content model for <listBibl>. I think we should now consult the community about possibly deprecating <relaatedItem>.

     
  • Syd Bauman

    Syd Bauman - 2014-09-07
    • status: open --> closed-wont-fix
     
  • Martin Holmes

    Martin Holmes - 2014-09-07

    Why does this FR lead you to think we should deprecate <relatedItem>? I find it quite useful, and I don't really see what it has to do with the availability or otherwise of <listRelation> or <relation> in <biblStruct>.

     

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks