#495 Allow <listRelation> in <biblStruct>

[Rachel Moloshok]

Per a recent discussion on the TEI Listserv (http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1401&L=TEI-L&F=&S=&X=150AC25AEDD4356587&P=39647), I'd like to request that listRelation be allowed within biblStruct, as it currently is for bibl. It's unclear why this is not currently allowed.

Thanks in advance,

RM

[James Cummings]

Assigning to Syd Bauman to triage and report to council, etc.

[Peter Stadler]

Council decided to reject the feature request as per Oxford meeting 2014-07-01. Reasons are:

• there are already (at least) two ways of linking <biblStruct>s: <relatedItem> and <link>
• <bibl> can nest (therefore acts as a list), hence is not in parallel with <biblStruct>

BUT, Council decided to add <listRelation> into <listBibl> for consistency with other list*

[Syd Bauman]

Closing this ticket “won’t fix” per tcm60 (minutes from 2014-06-30/07-02 Council meeting), and have add "( listRelation | relation )*" to end of content model for ＜listBibl＞. I think we should now consult the community about possibly deprecating ＜relaatedItem＞.

[Martin Holmes]

Why does this FR lead you to think we should deprecate <relatedItem>? I find it quite useful, and I don't really see what it has to do with the availability or otherwise of <listRelation> or <relation> in <biblStruct>.