Laurent Romary - 2014-01-09

There is a nice concept of subsumption between XML trees here, though. :-)

Le 9 janv. 2014 à 10:58, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :

i think we knew what we meant when we invented the idea if "conformable", but I suggest that it has not caught on as a concept in the intervening years, and it may be simpler to drop it.

[bugs:#634] "TEI-conformable" is meaningless

Status: open
Created: Wed Jan 08, 2014 08:53 PM UTC by Martin Holmes
Last Updated: Wed Jan 08, 2014 08:53 PM UTC
Owner: nobody

This previous bug:

dealt with some inconsistencies in usage and formatting of "TEI-conformant" and "TEI-conformable", but it did not address the elephant in the room: "TEI-conformable", as it is defined, is meaningless:

"A document is said to be TEI Conformable if it is a well-formed XML document which can be transformed algorithmically and automatically into a TEI Conformant document as defined above without loss of information."

This applies to any XML document. Even extreme cases of documents containing no TEI-like information at all, any information can be represented using e.g. feature structures. I suggest we remove this phrase from the Guidelines, and thus substantially simplify the USE chapter.

Sent from because you indicated interest in

To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit

Laurent Romary



Bugs: #634