[Tcpick-project] of the clause

[Mingo <gui...@ca...>]

S. 114 (1949). [454] 315 U.S. 203, 230 (1942). [455] Federalist No. 64.
[456] _See also_ 40 Op. Atty. Gen. 250, 253 (1942). [457] 343 U.S. 579,
639, 640. [458] Ibid. 653, 654. [459] 343 U.S. 579, 657. [460] Ibid.
659. [461] 2 Cr. 170 (1804). [462] 343 U.S. 579, 662, 663. [463] Ibid.
662. [464] 343 U.S. 579, 678, 679. [465] Ibid. 705. [466] Ibid. 708-709.
[467] 4 Wall. 475 (1867). [468] Ibid. 484. [469] Ibid. 500-501. [470]
Kendall _v._ United States, 12 Pet. 524 (1838); United States _v._ Lee,
106 U.S. 196 (1882). It should be noted, however, that if the President
fails to act, or if he adopts a narrow construction of a statute which
he dislikes, and on this ground professes inability to act, the only
remedy available against him is impeachment. [471] Noble _v._ Union
River Logging R. Co., 147 U.S. 165 (1893); Philadelphia Co. _v._
Stimson, 223 U.S. 605 (1912). [472] Kendall _v._ United States, above;
[Transcriber's Note: Reference is to Footnote 470, above.] United States
_v._ Schurz, 102 U.S. 378 (1880); United States ex rel. Dunlap _v._
Black, 128 U.S. 40 (1888). _Cf._ Decatur _v._ Paulding, 14 Pet. 497
(1840); and Riverside Oil Co. _v._ Hitchcock, 190 U.S. 316 (1903), where
the rule