I think this 'leadVehOfCst' is new changement of IEC61375-2-3. Please check with document 'iec61375-2-3-cor2{ed1.0}en.pdf' Page 7, there is a new Replacement of Figure E.3.
So from my point of view, this 'leadVehOfCst' should not be removed.
Thank you for pointing this out. I am not aware of this leadVehOfCst addition in the ECSP_CTRL.
Actually I am confused after checking out the discussion between UC and Gernot in the "IEC 61375-2-3_IS_collection_of_comments_2016-04-08.pdf", it seems that the decision is not to add the leadVehOfCst. (See No. 13 in the page 11)
Anyway, it could be better to double confirm with Gernot.
Last edit: Roy Chen 2017-03-09
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Also, the type of reserved01 should be UINT16.
New patch uploaded.
will be removed
Good morning Bernd
I think this 'leadVehOfCst' is new changement of IEC61375-2-3. Please check with document 'iec61375-2-3-cor2{ed1.0}en.pdf' Page 7, there is a new Replacement of Figure E.3.
So from my point of view, this 'leadVehOfCst' should not be removed.
Hi Kun,
Thank you for pointing this out. I am not aware of this leadVehOfCst addition in the ECSP_CTRL.
Actually I am confused after checking out the discussion between UC and Gernot in the "IEC 61375-2-3_IS_collection_of_comments_2016-04-08.pdf", it seems that the decision is not to add the leadVehOfCst. (See No. 13 in the page 11)
Anyway, it could be better to double confirm with Gernot.
Last edit: Roy Chen 2017-03-09
Re-opening this ticket.
After clarifiying with Gernot: leadVehOfCst belongs to ECSP control data and will be (re-)added.
Rejected / Undone as field (leadVehOfCst) was added in IEC change.