[Tclxml-users] Re: more tcldom questions

[Larry W. V. <lv...@ca...>]

> From: Forest Wilkinson <lyr...@ti...>
> To: tcl...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Tclxml-users] more tcldom questions
> Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 10:45:49 -0700
> 
> >% package require dom
> >2.6
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >% package require tcldom
> >2.0
> 
> The discrepency between version numbers is most likely because
> tcldompro (the implementation built from the tcldom/src dir) is at
> version 2.0, while the other implementations of tcldom are at 2.6.
> You only need one of the three implementations.  I am using the
> tcldompro (2.0) version, because I am able to build it and it is
> complete enough for my application (using tclsoap).

Note that the version descrepancy isn't the issue for me - I understand
that.  The problem is that dom::c just won't be resolved by itself,
even though it should be.

$ tclsh
% package require dom::c
can't find package dom::c
% ^d

$ tclsh
% package require tcldom
2.0
% package require dom::c
2.0
% 

Why do I have to package require tcldom before dom::c for dom::c to be
found?
-- 
Tcl - The glue of a new generation.  <URL: http://wiki.tcl.tk/ >
Larry W. Virden <mailto:lv...@ca...> <URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/>
Even if explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should 
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
-><-