From: Andreas K. <aku...@sh...> - 2003-03-26 02:07:50
|
> >What version of autoconf was used to create the configure in the CVS ? > >What version of autoconf did you use ? > > > >... Checking ... Here at ActiveState we regenerate most configure's via > >our autoconf, which is 2.13 ... And tclxml/expat/configure is in the list. > > > >In other words, we have never used the distributed configure. > > > >It can be bad. > > Truly. > > I am using the autoconf distributed by Red Hat for redhat linux 7.3. > autoconf --version reports: > Autoconf version 2.13 > > I can send you a diff between the distributed configure and the one No, thank you. > that my autoconf generates. At first glance, the diff appears pretty > big. This is something we better ask Steve (i.e. version of autoconf he is using to generate the configure). Note that many differences might simply be because of different line numbers (autoconf embeds line number into the generated configure. I guess that this is for debugging). The original configure (i.e. the one from CVS) might have something at the beginning indicating the version of autoconf which generated it. ... Yes, it does, line #4 of configure. Steve used autoconf 2.52. It is very well possible that the TEA macros clash with what autoconf 2.52 is doing. It can't tell you details, because I don't know them. This is definitely something Jeff Hobbs could/should know, or be made aware of. In the interim we should ask Steve to generate the distributed configure with autoconf 2.13 to prevent problems. -- So long, Andreas Kupries <aku...@sh...> <http://www.purl.org/NET/akupries/> Developer @ <http://www.activestate.com/> Join us at the Tenth Annual Tcl/Tk Conference <URL: http://wiki.tcl.tk/6274> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |