From: Michael A. C. <mi...@cl...> - 2003-01-09 19:12:57
|
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, chuck_ferril <chu...@ya...> wrote: > My experience with both packages came while attending the Tcl'2002 > conference a few months ago. > So from my point of view, tDOM was the answer since I needed XSLT. > And for anyone that has a chance to attend one of Steve's XML > presentations, don't miss it. XML was a big 'so what' to me until > those sessions. I only wish the tools he used were easier to build > and get working. > I recommend anyone try both for a short test and go with whatever > you feel most comfortable with. I'm in complete agreement with Chuck. I also attended Steve's tutorials at the Tcl 2002 conference, and found them to be very enlightening. I've ended up using tDOM since it was so much easier to get working with it, than fighting the build process for the TclXML packages. I've been thoroughly impressed with tDOM, it's speed, it's syntax/ease-of-use, and the fact that it can be made to work out of the box as an AOLserver shared library. It's nice to have choices. I'd suggest people do like Chuck suggested, and give each a try, and then go with either and/or both based on your own experiences. Michael |