Re: [Tclxml-users] tcldom 2.5 question

[Andreas K. <aku...@sh...>]

> Larry W. Virden wrote:
> > I am seeing the following behavior that seems strange to me - perhaps
> > I am misunderstanding something?
> > 
> > $ tclsh
> > % package require dom::tcl
> > can't read "::dom::strictDOM": no such variable
> > % package require dom::generic
> > 2.5
> > % package require dom::tcl
> > 2.5
> > 
> > If dom::tcl requires dom::generic to be loaded, then should it not do
> > a package require on it?
> 
> Yes, that appears to be correct.  Please submit a bug report
> on SF.
> 
> I haven't picked it up before now because I normally
> use 'package require dom'.

I do the same, i.e. 'package require dom'. So far I considered this
the official / blessed invocation of dom which loads everything
required and possible.

Despite this I am _not_ adverse to having 'package require' work for
all of the subordinate packages too.

This is something I did not touch when creating the TEA 2 build system
for all the tclxml/dom/xslt packages.

-- 
So long,
	Andreas Kupries <aku...@sh...>
			<http://www.purl.org/NET/akupries/>
	Developer @	<http://www.activestate.com/>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------