> > Does anyone knows a serious reason why tkpack & tkbind must
> not be removed?
>
> There is also tkwait. I don't think there is a reason, besides
> backwards compatibility with ourself.
but backward compatibility already lost, as we do not support Tcl/Tk-800,
and I think such code with 'tkwait' probably was used only in those days.
(I hope someday Tcl/Tk-800 support will be back, but this is really low
priority)
>
> > pack and bind will work fine instead, and in case anyone
> feels it will mess
> > with Perl's internal functions, will call them as Tcl::Tk::bind but
> > recommended way is to use $interp->bind(...).
>
> The tkbind, tkpack and tkwait functions are exported. Do you not want
> to export versions of these without the prefix, so they would have to
> go from the :misc export list then.
I think those should not be exported in misc as well.
:misc tag probably should also go away, both in implementation and
documentation?
Vadim.
|
